Proving X & Y Cannot Be Further From 1 Than Each Other

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimbo007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for two probabilities, \( p_0 \) and \( p_1 \), the ratio \( X = \frac{p_1}{p_0} \) cannot be further from 1 than \( Y = \frac{p_1(1-p_0)}{p_0(1-p_1)} \). The analysis is divided into three cases: when \( p_0 = p_1 \), \( p_0 > p_1 \), and \( p_0 < p_1 \). The conclusion drawn is that in cases where \( p_0 > p_1 \), \( X \) is greater than \( Y \), and in the reverse scenario, \( Y \) is greater than \( X \). The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in handling inequalities, especially when multiplying by negative numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of probability theory and ratios
  • Familiarity with inequalities and their manipulation
  • Knowledge of mathematical proofs and case analysis
  • Basic algebra, including operations with fractions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inequalities in probability theory
  • Learn about mathematical proof techniques, particularly case analysis
  • Explore the implications of multiplying inequalities by negative numbers
  • Investigate the behavior of functions involving probabilities at the boundaries (0 and 1)
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and students of probability theory seeking to deepen their understanding of inequalities involving probabilities and improve their proof-writing skills.

jimbo007
Messages
41
Reaction score
2
hi
i am trying to show that for 2 probabilities [tex]p_{0}[/tex] and [tex]p_{1}[/tex] that [tex]X=\frac{p_{1}}{p_{0}}[/tex] cannot be further from 1 than [tex]Y=\frac{p_{1}(1-p_{0})}{p_{0}(1-p_{1})}[/tex]

how i went about the problem was as follows:
i split it into 3 cases, case 1 is where [tex]p_{0}=p_{1}[/tex], case 2 is where [tex]p_{0}>p_{1}[/tex], and case 3 is [tex]p_{0}<p_{1}[/tex]

for case 1 we have [tex]X=Y=1[/tex] so X is not further from 1 than Y

for case 2 we require that [tex]\frac{1-p_{0}}{1-p_{1}}<1[/tex] for Y to be less than X
this is true if [tex]1-p_{0}<1-p_{1}[/tex]
<=> [tex]p_{0}>p_{1}[/tex]
which is what we were assuming in first place

case 3 is a similar argument but with the inequality sign changed from less than to greater than.

i don't think the reasoning is that great, for example can i assume that multiplying a number by another number that isless than 1 but greater than 0 will result in a number smaller than the original. also unsure about the implications in case 2.

i need to be shown how to improve the reasoning as I'm not satisfied with the current way it is but i can't think of any way to improve it.

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A note on the way you expressed this: you said "X cannot be further from 1 than Y" and I at first interpreted this to mean |1-X|< Y. But you clearly mean |1-X|< |1-Y|.

In tiny steps- If p0> p1 then p0/p1= X > 1 so |1-X|= X-1. Also, in this case, -p0> -p1 so 1-p0> 1-p1 and, finally, (1-p0)/(1-p1)> 0. Then
Y> X> 1 so |1-Y|= Y-1. You need to show X-1< Y-1 or X< Y (which we said above).
If p0 < p1 then the inequalities work the other way: Y< X< 1 so |1-X|= 1-X and |1-Y|= 1-Y. Now you need to show 1-X< 1-Y or X>Y (again, we just said that).

By the way, since probabilites CAN be equal to 0 or 1 you should state explicitely that your inequality does not work in those cases.
 
thanks for the reply!
i'm not sure i completely understand. for starters i can't see how you can say that -p0> -p1 and p0>p1. doesn't mutliplying by a negative change the inequality. and in your tiny step guide i see it boils down to showing whether X<Y, which was the the part i wasnt sure how to do.
case 2 for example (p0>p1):
do i show X<Y by first saying (along with inlcuding your "tiny steps") that we require
[tex]\frac{1-p_{0}}{1-p_{1}}<1[/tex] (*)
(*) is true iff [tex]1-p_{0}<1-p_{1}[/tex]
iff [tex]p_{0}>p_{1}[/tex] (**)
but we know (**) by assumption so (*) must also be true hence X<Y?

i think there were some subtleness in your proof but it kind of went *whoosh* straight over my head
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K