Thread Closed

Abstract Alg- Group theory and isomorphic sets.

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Apr24-10, 02:31 PM   #1
 

Abstract Alg- Group theory and isomorphic sets.


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

I am suppose to determine if the following list of groups are isomorphic and if they are define an isomorphic function for them.
a. [5[tex]Z[/tex], +],[12[tex]Z[/tex], +] where n[tex]Z[/tex] = {nz | z[tex]\in[/tex][tex]Z[/tex]}

b. [[tex]Z[/tex]6, +6]], [S6, [tex]\circ[/tex]]

c. [[tex]Z[/tex]2, +2]], [S2, [tex]\circ[/tex]]

2. Relevant equations
+6 means x +6] y = the remainder of (x+y)/6

To prove not isomorphic we are suppose to show that the two sets are not one-to-one, or one is commutative while the other is not, etc.


3. The attempt at a solution
For a, I am fairly certain they are isomorphic and that the function should be f(x) = (12/5)x since it is a bijective function and f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y).

For b, My gut feeling is that it is not isomorphic however I can't find a good reason why. Perhaps because the second group is not commutative. However that answer just doesn't sit well with me.

Finally, for c I am confused because S2 = {(1,2), (2,1)} while [tex]Z[/tex]2 ={0, 1,2} so it seems like there could be an isomorphic function but I'm uncertain what that function could be without it being piecewise for each element 0, 1, and 2.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> King Richard III found in 'untidy lozenge-shaped grave'
>> Google Drive sports new view and scan enhancements
>> Researcher admits mistakes in stem cell study
Apr24-10, 04:04 PM   #2
 
If you're gut feeling is that one of the groups is not commutative, then try showing it by finding two elements that don't commute with each other.

Also remember that the cardinality of the groups must be the same for a bijective correspondence
Apr24-10, 06:07 PM   #3
 
A is correct.

[tex]Z_2=\left\{0,1\right\}[/tex], not [tex]\left\{0,1,2\right\}[/tex].

[tex]S_2=\left\{id,(1\;2)\right\}[/tex], and it's easy to see C is isomorphic. The function is [tex](0\mapsto id),(1\mapsto (1\;2))[/tex] (this notation is probably not right, though), and one can verify it by enumerating all possibilities.

It's also easy to see that B is not isomorphic, since the cardinality of [tex]S_6[/tex] is 720, while the cardinality of [tex]Z_6[/tex] is 6.
Apr24-10, 09:06 PM   #4
 

Abstract Alg- Group theory and isomorphic sets.


Thank you to both of you for your help.

[tex]Z_2=\left\{0,1\right\}[/tex], not [tex]\left\{0,1,2\right\}[/tex].

Thank you for point that out! I was going from my lecture notes and I had written it down wrong. This makes the problem make a lot more sense.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Abstract Alg- Group theory and isomorphic sets.
Thread Forum Replies
Isomorphic G sets Linear & Abstract Algebra 3
Group Theory Sets and Mappings Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Introduction to Group Theory - Abstract Algebra Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Abstract Algebra: Isomorphic polynomial rings Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
any recommendations for books on Group Theory/Abstract Algebra Science Textbook Discussion 1