Thread Closed

Confusing Force function

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
May13-10, 11:34 AM   #1
 

Confusing Force function


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
The force on a particle is directed along an x axis and given by [tex] F = F_0(\frac {x}{x_0} -1) [/tex]. Find the work done by the force in moving the particle from x = 0 to [tex] x = 2x_0 [/tex]


2. Relevant equations
F=ma, W=Fd, etc.


3. The attempt at a solution
I don't even know how to interpret that function. Does the [tex] x_0 [/tex] mean the initial position? Does [tex] F_0 [/tex] mean the initial force? I'm so confused. Any help would be appreciated.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> King Richard III found in 'untidy lozenge-shaped grave'
>> Google Drive sports new view and scan enhancements
>> Researcher admits mistakes in stem cell study
May13-10, 12:15 PM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 27
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Hi DrummingAtom!

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box )
Quote by DrummingAtom View Post
I don't even know how to interpret that function. Does the [tex] x_0 [/tex] mean the initial position? Does [tex] F_0 [/tex] mean the initial force?
That's right

a "0" subscript always means a constant (usually the value at t = 0).

(oh … except in relativity, where x0 means time! )
May13-10, 07:32 PM   #3
 
I'm still confused on this one. So, if x0 F0 are constants then how would the graph of this function look? Because they want you to graph F(x) before integrating. I mean what do you pick for your constant in a situation like this? I know it's going to be a linear function.
May13-10, 08:19 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help

Confusing Force function


Quote by DrummingAtom View Post
I'm still confused on this one. So, if x0 F0 are constants then how would the graph of this function look? Because they want you to graph F(x) before integrating. I mean what do you pick for your constant in a situation like this? I know it's going to be a linear function.
It doesn't really matter, as long as x0 is not 0 (otherwise you'll have a divide by zero problem). But if you want to make your life easier, put it on the positive x-axis somewhere. I suggest putting it at x = 1. That way you'll integrate from 0 to 2. But don't label you x-axis with '1' and '2'; rather label you x-axis to go from

0....x0...2x0...3x0...

Now when you consider your graph's labels, you are integrating from 0 to 2x0, as the problem specifies!

The y-axis is F. So where does F0 fit into your graph? I'll let you do that.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Confusing Force function
Thread Forum Replies
Confusing/tricky question about force General Physics 2
Dirac delta function - its confusing Calculus 7
Force statements. CONFUSING... Introductory Physics Homework 6
[Q]Some confusing about Dirac Delta Function Quantum Physics 4
Confusing force problem Introductory Physics Homework 13