Tice
- 3
- 0
A friend and I are having a debate on this and I just need to know yes or no, and why?
If the Earth were to stop spinning, scales would read higher due to the absence of centrifugal force, which currently reduces the normal force experienced by individuals at the equator by approximately 0.25% of their weight. However, the actual gravitational weight, defined as mass times gravitational acceleration (m*g), would remain unchanged. Over time, the Earth would transition from an oblate spheroid to a spherical shape, affecting weight distribution. The gravitational pull would vary based on geographic location, with equatorial regions experiencing the most significant changes.
PREREQUISITESStudents of physics, geophysicists, and anyone interested in the effects of planetary motion on weight and gravity.
MikeyW said:So the scale measurement rises but your weight technically (as m*g) is unchanged.
That's not true, either. The Earth is not a sphere. It is an oblate spheroid. If the Earth were to stop spinning it would settle from this oblate spheroidal shape to a sphere. This would cause both the scale and freshman physics definitions of weight to increase (assuming you are standing at the equator).MikeyW said:So the scale measurement rises but your weight technically (as m*g) is unchanged.
Tice said:If the Earth were to stop spinning, would we weigh more?
A friend and I are having a debate on this and I just need to know yes or no, and why?

72Zorad said:I don't see any discussion here regarding the increased mass of a rotating body. Doesn't E=MC squared mean that any object in motion gains mass due to the kinetic energy. And if mass increases so does gravitational pull between the objects (earth and myself). Also, if the Earth stopped spinning I wouldn't have any centrifugal force from the spinning, right? Are both of these forces so small the difference would be negligible?
Thanks,