| Thread Closed |
A question on proof of Riesz Representation Theorem when p=1 |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jun23-10, 12:20 AM | #1 |
|
|
A question on proof of Riesz Representation Theorem when p=1
This question comes from the proof of Riesz Representation Theorem in Bartle's "The Elements of Integration and Lebesgue Measure", page 90-91, as the image below shows.
![]() The equation (8.10) is [tex]G(f)=\int fgd\mu[/tex]. The definition of [tex]L^\infty[/tex] space is as follows: ![]() My question is: why the g determined by Radon-Nikodym Theorem is in [tex]L^\infty[/tex]? I can only prove that it is Lebesgue integrable, that is, belongs to [tex]L^1[/tex] space, but the proof mentions no word on why it is in [tex]L^\infty[/tex], that is, bounded a.e.. Could you please tell me how to prove this? Thanks! |
| Jun25-10, 06:46 AM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Suppose g is not a.e. bounded, then for every n we can find An with [itex]0<\mu(A_n)<\infty[/itex] such that for all [itex]x\in A_n[/itex] we have [itex]|g(x)|>n[/itex]. Now take [tex]f_0:=\frac{1_{A_n}|g|}{g}.[/tex] Then [tex]\|G\|=\sup\frac{|Gf|}{\|f\|}\geq \frac{|Gf_0|}{\|f_0\|}=\frac{1}{\mu(A_n)}\left|\int fg\right|=\frac{1}{\mu(A_n)}\int_{A_n} |g|>n,[/tex] in contradiction with G being bounded. |
| Jun25-10, 08:27 PM | #3 |
|
|
Yes! this is the proof! Thank you for the ingenious construction, I got it.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: A question on proof of Riesz Representation Theorem when p=1
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Riesz representation theorem example | Calculus | 4 | ||
| Proof: Basis Representation Theorem | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 3 | ||
| Proof of the Riesz theorem | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 12 | ||
| riesz representation theorem | Calculus | 4 | ||
| Riesz lemma for Lebesgue differentiation theorem | Calculus | 16 | ||