Register to reply

A question on proof of Riesz Representation Theorem when p=1

by zzzhhh
Tags: proof, representation, riesz, theorem
Share this thread:
Jun23-10, 12:20 AM
P: 39
This question comes from the proof of Riesz Representation Theorem in Bartle's "The Elements of Integration and Lebesgue Measure", page 90-91, as the image below shows.

The equation (8.10) is [tex]G(f)=\int fgd\mu[/tex].

The definition of [tex]L^\infty[/tex] space is as follows:

My question is: why the g determined by Radon-Nikodym Theorem is in [tex]L^\infty[/tex]? I can only prove that it is Lebesgue integrable, that is, belongs to [tex]L^1[/tex] space, but the proof mentions no word on why it is in [tex]L^\infty[/tex], that is, bounded a.e.. Could you please tell me how to prove this? Thanks!
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
What lit up the universe?
Sheepdogs use just two simple rules to round up large herds of sheep
Animals first flex their muscles
Jun25-10, 06:46 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 905
Quote Quote by zzzhhh View Post
I can only prove that it is Lebesgue integrable, that is, belongs to [tex]L^1[/tex] space
The L^1 property already comes from Radon-Nikodym, right? Radon-Nikodym says such a g in L^1 exists. To prove it is also in L^\infty, what about this:

Suppose g is not a.e. bounded, then for every n we can find An with [itex]0<\mu(A_n)<\infty[/itex] such that for all [itex]x\in A_n[/itex] we have [itex]|g(x)|>n[/itex]. Now take


[tex]\|G\|=\sup\frac{|Gf|}{\|f\|}\geq \frac{|Gf_0|}{\|f_0\|}=\frac{1}{\mu(A_n)}\left|\int fg\right|=\frac{1}{\mu(A_n)}\int_{A_n} |g|>n,[/tex]

in contradiction with G being bounded.
Jun25-10, 08:27 PM
P: 39
Yes! this is the proof! Thank you for the ingenious construction, I got it.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Riesz representation theorem example Calculus 4
Proof: Basis Representation Theorem Linear & Abstract Algebra 3
Proof of the Riesz theorem Linear & Abstract Algebra 12
Riesz representation theorem Calculus 4
Riesz lemma for Lebesgue differentiation theorem Calculus 16