Find Resoance Frequency for Electric Motor Mass of 100 kg

  • Thread starter Thread starter bullet_ballet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resonance
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the resonance frequency of an electric motor with a mass of 100 kg, supported by vertical springs that compress when the motor is installed. Participants are exploring the relationship between the spring constant, gravitational force, and the resulting frequency of resonance.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for resonance frequency and question the values used for the spring compression. There is an exploration of the implications of using incorrect units and the fundamental understanding of the problem setup.

Discussion Status

Several participants have identified potential errors in calculations and unit conversions. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the assumptions made regarding the spring compression and its impact on the resonance frequency. The discussion is ongoing with attempts to reconcile differing results.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available for resolving discrepancies in calculations. The original poster's reference to a book solution suggests a need for alignment with established results.

bullet_ballet
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
"An electric motor of mass 100 kg is supported by vertical springs which compress by 1 mm when the motor is installed. If the motor's armature is not properly balanced, for what revolutions/minute would a resonance occur?"

I set my frame of reference at the end of the spring. Therefore, F = kx - mg = 0. To get resonance ω must equal ω0 which is √(k/m) or √(g/x). I know g to be 9.82 m/s² and x to be 1 mm. Therefore, √(g/x) = 31.3 rps or 1878 rpm. The book lists 955 rpm, so where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you used x = 1 mm as if it was x = 1 m.
 
suffian said:
you used x = 1 mm as if it was x = 1 m.

I see that I made the mistake of dividing g by .01m and not .001m, but that only makes the answer worse at 5950 rpm. My mistake is definitely more fundamental, but I can't see it.
 
sqrt(g/x) = sqrt( [ 9.80 m/s² ]/[ .001 m ] ) = 98.99 rad/s = [ 98.99 rad/s ][ 1/2pi rev/rad ][ 60 s/min ] = 945 rpm.
 
Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K