| Thread Closed |
fermat's last theorem???? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Aug20-10, 07:51 PM | #1 |
|
|
fermat's last theorem????
What is Fermat's last theorem?
and How is that related to primes numbers of form 3x+1 and 3x+2 |
| Aug20-10, 07:57 PM | #2 |
|
|
|
| Aug21-10, 07:12 AM | #3 |
|
|
FLT states: If n is an integer greater than 2, then there are no non-trivial integer solutions to the equation [tex]x^n+y^n=z^n[/tex].
One reduction for the proof is that it would be enough to prove the case when [tex]n[/tex] is prime (or 4). The case [tex]n=4[/tex] is classical. It turns out that argument for primes of the form [tex]3k+1[/tex] is different than for primes of the form [tex]3k+2[/tex]. *warning, Latex seems out of whack today* |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: fermat's last theorem????
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Fermat Last Theorem look-alike | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 17 | ||
| Goodbye, Fermat’s theorem! | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 1 | ||
| Was Fermat too bold about her last theorem? | General Math | 24 | ||
| Fermat’s Theorem | General Physics | 0 | ||