Why Are Repeating Decimals Less Than Denominator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uranium_235
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of repeating decimals and their relationship to fractions, specifically questioning why the number of repeating digits in a decimal representation is less than the denominator of the fraction.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the reasoning behind the conclusion that the number of repeating digits is always less than the denominator. Some participants suggest exploring long division as a method to uncover this relationship, while others express a desire for a mathematical proof to support the claim.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights about long division and the behavior of remainders during the process. There is a request for a formal proof, indicating a need for further exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that the topic will be discussed in class, highlighting the urgency for clarity on the matter before the lesson.

uranium_235
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
If the repeating decimal is equal to a/b, why is the number of repeating digits less than the denominator b?
This was a question on my homework, and I could not find mathematical proof for the conclusion that number repeating digits is always less than b.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The key lies in doing long division (at least that's how I discovered it way back when); run through a few dozen examples, maybe you'll pick up on it.
 
I don’t wish to seem a bit impatient, but is it possible one could post the mathematical proof? We will most likely be going over this in class tomorrow, and I do not wish to be behind in the event I am not able to find the answer before then.
 
Okay - imagine performing long division of an integer by an integer. In each step you have a remainder. There are only N possible remainders (from 0 up to N-1). If one of them is 0 then you're done. Otherwise, of the other possible remainders (from 1 up to N-1) you can only go through N-1 steps before one of those very same remainders occurs once again - it's inevitable! At that point, each step repeats the previous ones and therefore your quotient must repeat over and over!
 
Thank you for your help, Tide and Hurkyl.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K