
#1
Sep1910, 11:35 PM

P: 63

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Assume the vector function A = ax(3x[tex]^{2}[/tex]2y[tex]^{2}[/tex])ax(x[tex]^{3}[/tex]y[tex]^{2}[/tex]) a) Find [tex]\oint[/tex]A[tex]\cdot[/tex]dl around the triangular contour shown in Fig. 236 [it is a triangle with base and height of one on the x and y axis. the curl travels so that the normal vector is in the z direction] b) Evaluate [tex]\int[/tex]([tex]\nabla[/tex][tex]\times[/tex]A)[tex]\cdot[/tex]ds over the triangular area. 2. Relevant equations The equation in part a) should be equivalent to that of b) as per Stoke's theorem 3. The attempt at a solution Part a) is where I'm having trouble. Here is my work for that and I am 100% sure it is incorrect. I have no idea how to set it up, that's my problem. The execution is no big deal, but the setup part is. Any guidance is appreciated. A[tex]\cdot[/tex]dl = [ax(3x[tex]^{2}[/tex]2y[tex]^{2}[/tex])ax(x[tex]^{3}[/tex]y[tex]^{2}[/tex]) [tex]\cdot[/tex] [ax(dx) + ay(dy)] = 3x[tex]^{2}[/tex]y[tex]^{2}[/tex]dx  x[tex]^{3}[/tex]y[tex]^{2}[/tex]dy [tex]_{1}[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex][tex]\int[/tex]3x[tex]^{2}[/tex]y[tex]^{2}[/tex]dx  [tex]_{1}[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex][tex]\int[/tex]x[tex]^{3}[/tex]y[tex]^{2}[/tex]dy I then said the area of the triangle is equal to 1/2 (since .5*1*1 = .5) From there I said x = 1/y and y =1/x so I could plug into each equation to get: [tex]_{1}[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex][tex]\int[/tex]3x[tex]^{2}[/tex](1/y)[tex]^{2}[/tex]dx  [tex]_{1}[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex][tex]\int[/tex](1/x)[tex]^{3}[/tex]y[tex]^{2}[/tex]dy = 3  ln(2) =2.3068 PART B: I'm fairly confident in my execution of this, but it would be worth verifying. [tex]\nabla[/tex][tex]\times[/tex]A = ax([tex]\partial[/tex]/[tex]\partial[/tex]y * Az  [tex]\partial[/tex]/[tex]\partial[/tex]z * Ay) + ay([tex]\partial[/tex]/[tex]\partial[/tex]z * Ax  [tex]\partial[/tex]/[tex]\partial[/tex]x * Az) + az([tex]\partial[/tex]/[tex]\partial[/tex]x * Ay  [tex]\partial[/tex]/[tex]\partial[/tex]y * Ax) = ax(00) + ay(00) + az(6x[tex]^{4}[/tex]y[tex]^{4}[/tex] + 6x[tex]^{5}[/tex]y[tex]^{3}[/tex]) ds = ds[tex]_{z}[/tex] = dxdy [tex]\int[/tex]([tex]\nabla[/tex][tex]\times[/tex]A)[tex]\cdot[/tex]ds = [tex]_{1}[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex][tex]\int[/tex][tex]_{1}[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex][tex]\int[/tex](6x[tex]^{4}[/tex]y[tex]^{4}[/tex] + 6x[tex]^{5}[/tex]y[tex]^{3}[/tex])dxdy = 5.61 EDIT for some reason the tex stuff is being really obnoxious for me. the 12 that your seeing is the boundry of the integral (going from 1 to 2) and if you look carefully, there is a dot in between A and dl and others like that. I apologize for it looking crappy! 



#2
Sep2010, 12:13 AM

P: 63

I done screwed up. Part b the cross product I did was wrong, stupid mistake. It should be the double integral of 3x^2y^26x^2y dxdy from 1 to 2 on both integrals which equals 112/3




#3
Sep2010, 12:16 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 11,534

When you write equations with LaTeX, write the whole thing with LaTeX rather than trying to mix it in with plain text.
Your vector field looks screwy, since you have ax twice, which I assume is a_{x}, the unit vector in the x direction. And are the 2 and 3 in the first term really separate numerical factors? It just seems strange they weren't multiplied together already. In part A, I'm not sure what you're doing with the area and x=1/y and y=1/x stuff. You need to handle each leg of the triangle separately and then add the results. One way to do line integrals is to parameterize the contour so you have x=x(t) and y=y(t) and dx=x'(t) dt and dy=y'(t) dt so you end up with an integral with respect to t. For example, on the leg that goes from the origin to (1,0), you could use x(t)=t, y(t)=0 where t runs from 0 to 1. Then dx=dt and dy=0. Plug everything in and integrate from 0 to 1. In part B, you calculated the curl incorrectly. You have higher powers of x and y than you do in the original vector field. Differentiation will lower them, if anything. You should figure out what the correct curl is first. 



#4
Sep2010, 12:26 AM

P: 63

Curl of a vector fieldIn part A that's what I wasn't sure about. I wasn't sure if I had to do each line. I'll give that a go. IN part B yeah, I realized that soon after I posted that it was stupidly wrong. I think I replied as you were as I addressed that issue already my new integral is [tex]\int _{1}^{2}\int _{1}^{2}3x^{2}y^{2}6x^{2}ydxdy = 112/3[/tex] which makes more sense as the curl has a normal vector in the negative z direction. (At least, that's how it makes sense to me) 



#5
Sep2010, 12:34 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 11,534

Yeah, you posted while I was writing earlier. For part B, I got 7/60. You're going clockwise around the triangle, right? I inferred that because you said the normal points in the z direction.
What limits did you use for x and y? 



#6
Sep2010, 12:55 AM

P: 63

Now my integral I have for part b is [tex]\int_{1}^{2} \int_{1}^{2} (3x^{2}y^{2}  6x^{2}y)dxdy [/tex] I'm assuming this is incorrect as when I input boundaries of 0 to 1 I get 4/3 and not 7/60. I have [tex]\nabla \times A = ax(\partial / \partial z x^{3}y^{2}) + ay(\partial / \partial z 3x^{2}y^{2}) + az(\partial / \partial x x^{3}y^{2}  \partial / \partial y 3x^{2}y^{2}) = ax(0) + ay(0) +az(3x^{2}y^{2}  6x^{2}y)[/tex] I don't see anything wrong with what I did though. 



#7
Sep2010, 01:09 AM

P: 63

I redid part a based on your recommendation (though I didn't see any benefit in parameterizing the curve, am I missing something?)
Here's what I got: Integral I worked off of: [tex]\int 3x^{2}y^{2}dx  \int x^{3}y^{2}dy[/tex] Leg 1 (from (1,1) to (2,1)) [tex]\int_{1}^{2}3x^{2}dx = 7[/tex] Leg 2 (from (1,1) to (1,2)) [tex]\int_{1}^{2}8y^{2}dy = 56/3[/tex] Leg 3 (from (1,1) to (2,2)) [tex]\int_{1}^{2}3x^{2}dx  \int_{1}^{2}8y^{2}dy = 35/3[/tex] So Leg 1 + Leg 2 + Leg 3 = 70/3 I'm pretty sure I did at least the last leg wrong, but am I getting on the right track? EDIT wait, if that first leg is negative, then I get 112/3 which is what I got for part b. But how, mathematically, would I get that first one equal to 7 rather than +7 without needing to change the bounds on all my other functions (which would just give me 70/3 instead)? 



#8
Sep2010, 01:45 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 11,534





#9
Sep2010, 01:50 AM

P: 63





#10
Sep2010, 01:55 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 11,534





#11
Sep2010, 02:03 AM

P: 63

Sorry, again, I'm just really tired. When I wrote that second one down I seemed to have flipped the y and x axis in my head. It made sense to me, but that's about it haha 



#12
Sep2010, 02:10 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 11,534

I got a final answer of 593/30 with the last contour you described. Here's what I got for each leg, so you can check your results:
81/10 for (1,1) to (2,2) 56/3 for (2,2) to (2,1) 7 for (2,1) to (1,1) So it looks like you have two legs done, except for possible sign problems. On the hypotenuse, neither x nor y is constant, but you know that x=y on that part of the contour. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Gauss' Theorum and curl of a vector field  Calculus & Beyond Homework  3  
divergence and curl of vector field defined by \vec A = f(r)vec r  Advanced Physics Homework  4  
Curl about an elipse. Line integral of vector field  Calculus & Beyond Homework  3  
A question about path independence and curl of a vector field  Calculus  4 