Thread Closed

Is every manifold triangulable?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Sep22-10, 06:44 AM   #1
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor

Is every manifold triangulable?


In Lee's Intro to topological manifolds, p.105, it is written that every manifold of dimension 3 or below is triangulable. But in dimension 4, threre are known examples of non triangulable manifolds. In dimensions greater than four, the answer is unknown.

But in Bott-Tu p.190, it is written that every manifold admits a triangulation.

Which is right?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> 'Whodunnit' of Irish potato famine solved
>> The mammoth's lament: Study shows how cosmic impact sparked devastating climate change
>> Curiosity Mars rover drills second rock target
Sep22-10, 07:20 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by quasar987 View Post
In Lee's Intro to topological manifolds, p.105, it is written that every manifold of dimension 3 or below is triangulable. But in dimension 4, threre are known examples of non triangulable manifolds. In dimensions greater than four, the answer is unknown.

But in Bott-Tu p.190, it is written that every manifold admits a triangulation.

Which is right?
I would guess that Bott and Tu mean every smooth manifold since their book is about differential topology. It is a theorem of Whitehead, I believe, that every smooth manifold has a smooth triangulation.
Sep22-10, 07:32 AM   #3
 
It seems that the authors probably have different definitions of triangulation.
In my opinion, the problem boils down to whether every interval isomorphic to some interval in R^n is triangulable & hence the second statement looks good.
Sep22-10, 07:58 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor

Is every manifold triangulable?


Quote by quasar987 View Post
In Lee's Intro to topological manifolds, p.105, it is written that every manifold of dimension 3 or below is triangulable. But in dimension 4, threre are known examples of non triangulable manifolds. In dimensions greater than four, the answer is unknown.

But in Bott-Tu p.190, it is written that every manifold admits a triangulation.

Which is right?
R. ]Kirby and L. C. Siebenmann, On the triangulation of manifolds and the hauptvermutung,
Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 75 (1969), 742-749.

This paper is said to have an example of a non-triangulable 6 manifold
Sep23-10, 11:24 PM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
it seems indeed to depend on your definition of triangulation. in gneral the answer may be unknown.

consult: the history of topology by ioan mackenzie (or ask ron stern)

http://books.google.com/books?id=7iR...ble%3F&f=false
Oct5-10, 02:39 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by lavinia View Post
I would guess that Bott and Tu mean every smooth manifold since their book is about differential topology. It is a theorem of Whitehead, I believe, that every smooth manifold has a smooth triangulation.
In Whitney's geometric integration p.124, he credits S.S. Cains (1934) with Whitehead (1940) giving an improvement of the proof in "On Cą complexes, Annals of Math. 41"
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Is every manifold triangulable?
Thread Forum Replies
Manifold ?! Differential Equations 4
manifold and metric General Astronomy 2
O(3) a 3-manifold in R^9 Calculus 4
Hybrid Manifold Beyond the Standard Model 0
Hybrid Manifold Beyond the Standard Model 0