The Irrationality of Pi: Why Squaring a Circle is Impossible

In summary, the problem of squaring a circle involves constructing a square with the same area as a given circle using only circular arcs and straight lines. This was a challenge presented in ancient Greek mathematics and was attempted using ruler and compass. However, it was later proven that the number pi, which is necessary to construct the square, is not the root of any polynomial equation. This means that pi cannot be constructed by Euclidean moves and therefore, the circle cannot be squared. This has been confirmed through various mathematical proofs and constructions.
  • #1
JetBlckNewYr03
13
0
I know this may seem like a silly question to those of you that are well versed in mathematics. But here is my question: Why can't we square circles? What problems do we encounter when trying to do so?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The problem really is to construct a square with the same area as a given circle using only circular arcs and straight lines (usually stated as ruler and compass, but it's important that you are not allowed to use the ruler to measure, only to draw straight lines). These were the construction tools used in all the constructions in Euclid, and this is the way the ancient greeks stated the problem.

Now given the circle with its radius (easy to construct), the area in question is [pi]r2. So if we could construct that square, say its side is x, we would have x2 = [pi]r2. or solving for [pi], [pi] = x22[/sup].

Now we assumed that x was constructible in the sense I gave above. The only length we had to start with was r. Using analytical geometry (x and y coordinates) you can prove that any length constructible from r will be the root of a polynomial in r. This is not deep, you just go through each step in the construction, express the lines and circle as functions of r - the lines will be linear functions and the circles will be square root function (roots of quadratic equations). and all the equations will multply together to get the equation of the whole construction and it will be a polynomial in r. So x, the side of tht square is the root of a polynomial in r. Plugging in that polynomial for x in our equation above and collecting terms we have a polunomial in r = 0, or r is a root of a polynomial.

But we have known since Lindemann proved it in the 1890s that [pi] is not the root of _any_ polynomial. The proof is hard. It is just possible to follow it if you had a very good two semester class in Calculus and were at the top of the class. But there is no doubt about it, [pi] is not the root of any polynomial, and every constructible number is such a root, so [pi] cannot be constructed by Euclidean moves. But squaring the circle, as we showed above, amounts to such a construction of [pi]. Therefore the circle cannot be squared.
 
  • #3
SelfAdjoint's answer is excellent.


I just want to point out that one can, in fact, prove that any
"constructible" length must be the root of some polynomial equation of order 2n (technically, the number is "algebraic of order a power of 2").

A circle of radius 1 has area pi. A square of area pi must have sides of length sqrt(pi) so if it were possible to construct a square with the same area then it would be possible to construct a segment whose length is sqrt(pi) which, like pi, is not algebraic of ANY order.

Similarly, if it were possible to trisect ANY angle, then it would be possible to a length that is algebraic, but of order 3, not a power of 2. (This is a result of the fact that we can write sin(3*theta) as a cubic polynomial in sin(theta).)

If it were possible to "duplicate a cube"- that is, using 3 dimensional analogs of straight edge and compass (that would allow to construct the plane through 3 given points and part of a sphere with given center and radius) with twice the volume of a given cube, then it would be possible to construct a segment of length cube root of 2: again algebraic of order 3, not a power of 2.
 
  • #4
Ha Ha!

I have heard this question posed and answered many times over the years by learned people who answered it in terms of "Pi is irrational and no matter how accurately you measure the sides of your square the square of the sides will equal pi."

Apparently they never had a clue what they were talking about even though in their own fields they were experts. Thanks.
 

1. Why is it impossible to square a circle?

The reason it is impossible to square a circle is because the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter, known as pi (π), is an irrational number. This means it cannot be expressed as a finite decimal or as a ratio of two whole numbers. Since squaring a circle involves creating a square with the same area as a given circle, it would require a method to construct a square root of an irrational number, which is mathematically impossible.

2. Can't we just use an approximation of pi to square a circle?

No, using an approximation of pi would not solve the problem. While an approximation of pi may be sufficient for many practical purposes, it would still not provide an exact solution for squaring a circle. The construction of a square using an approximation of pi would result in a shape that is not exactly equal in area to the given circle.

3. Are there any exceptions or special cases where a circle can be squared?

No, there are no exceptions or special cases where a circle can be squared. This problem has been proven to be impossible using only a compass and straightedge, which are the only tools allowed in the ancient Greek geometrical construction method.

4. Is there any other method or tool that can be used to square a circle?

No, there is no other method or tool that can be used to square a circle. The problem of squaring a circle is not simply a limitation of the tools used, but rather a fundamental mathematical concept. Even with modern technology, it is still impossible to create a perfect square with the same area as a given circle.

5. Why do we still talk about squaring a circle if it's impossible?

The concept of squaring a circle has been a topic of debate and discussion for centuries. While it has been proven to be impossible, it still serves as an important thought experiment and highlights the limitations of geometry and mathematics. It also has practical applications in fields such as architecture and engineering, where approximations of pi are used to create functional structures.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
696
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
758
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
830
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top