Gravity and Energy: Attraction & Velocity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rave77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Gravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of cooling boiling water in a metal bucket using liquid nitrogen, comparing two methods: spraying from above versus spraying from below while covering the bucket with grass. It concludes that cooling from above is generally more efficient due to the density of cooler fluids. Additionally, the conversation addresses the nature of gravity, clarifying that while gravitational waves propagate at the speed of light, the attractive force of gravity itself also operates under this principle, with a delay in gravitational pull as objects move closer together.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics and heat transfer principles
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational theory and gravitational waves
  • Familiarity with the properties of liquid nitrogen and its cooling effects
  • Concept of spacetime distortion in relation to gravity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the thermodynamic properties of liquid nitrogen and its applications in cooling
  • Study gravitational waves and their implications in modern physics
  • Explore the principles of heat transfer in fluids, particularly in cooling applications
  • Investigate the relationship between gravity, distance, and the speed of light
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of thermodynamics and gravitational theory, particularly in experimental and theoretical contexts.

rave77
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have the following question:

Let's suppose that I have a bucket filled with boiling water (metal bucket), and I intend to freeze the water by spaying liquid nitrogen to it.
Which of this two would be the most effective way to achieve my goal:
Placing it on the grass and spraying it from above? Or from below hanging and covering the bucket with a block of grass? (The exact same block of grass is used in both cases).

This is a different question; if you could help me answer it I would appreciate it.
A friend of mine asked me:
How fast does gravity travel.
I told him that gravity does not travel, all matter in this universe is connected, no matter how far apart they are from each other.
Then he asked me the following question:
If a particle starts traveling at a great velocity heading towards another. How fast would the attraction increase as they both shorten the distance among them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravitational waves propagate at the speed of light. If an object you are gravitationally pulled to moves, there is a speed-of-light delay before gravitational pull changes.

Usually, cooling fluids from above is more efficient, as cooler fluid is more dense and will sink to the bottom, mixing the fluid you are cooling.
 
K^2 said:
Gravitational waves propagate at the speed of light. If an object you are gravitationally pulled to moves, there is a speed-of-light delay before gravitational pull changes.

Usually, cooling fluids from above is more efficient, as cooler fluid is more dense and will sink to the bottom, mixing the fluid you are cooling.

This response might be a bit misleading to the original poster, I just wanted to clarify a little bit (unless I am the one being misleading and am incorrect here) there is a difference between gravity itself as a force and gravitational waves.

Gravitational waves also travel at the speed of light, but they are an actual distorting of spacetime for example orbiting black holes creating gravity waves/gravity radiation.

Gravity itself as an attractive force or gravitons also travel at the speed of light though, and this is what is responsible for the pull of gravity. I do not believe it is gravitational waves that cause massive objects to be attractive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K