Light & Photons: Understanding Reflection & Stimulation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter primal schemer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Photons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion revolves around the nature of photons, specifically in the context of visibility in a completely dark room and the mechanisms of reflection and emission of light. Participants explore concepts related to how light interacts with objects, the conditions under which visibility occurs, and the differences between reflected and emitted photons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why an object (a red car) cannot be seen in a completely dark room, suggesting it may be due to the absence of emitted photons or the inability of the eyes to detect them.
  • Another participant asserts that in a dark room, there are no visible wavelength photons present, implying that visibility requires light to be reflected from the object.
  • Contrarily, a different participant claims that there are visible wavelength photons, but the eyes may not be sensitive enough to detect them, regardless of adjustment time.
  • Participants discuss the mechanics of how shining a torch allows the observer to see the car, with some stating that the light from the torch reflects off the car and returns to the observer's eyes.
  • There is confusion among participants regarding whether the photons seen are the same as those emitted from the torch or if they are new photons generated by the car's surface.
  • Some participants clarify that generally, reflected photons are identical to those absorbed, while others suggest that reflection may involve absorption and re-emission processes.
  • Discussion includes the concept of thermal radiation, with participants explaining that hot objects emit photons due to atomic vibrations, leading to blackbody radiation.
  • One participant seeks clarification on the distinction between reflection and emission, suggesting that reflection involves photons being emitted after being struck by incoming photons, while emission occurs independently due to thermal agitation of atoms.
  • There is a debate about whether the visible light emitted by objects at room temperature is detectable, with some arguing that the intensity is too low for human perception.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the visibility of photons in darkness, the nature of reflected versus emitted photons, and the mechanisms of thermal radiation. No consensus is reached on these points, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various phenomena such as incandescence, phosphorescence, and blackbody radiation without resolving the complexities involved in these processes. The discussion also highlights limitations in human perception of low-intensity light.

primal schemer
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

I`m having a bit of trouble understanding photons, and have thought up of a scenario that may clear up my thinking on it.

First of all, imagine a completely dark room (say, one made completely out of concrete, with no doors or anything, so light can`t sneak in through keyholes etc). I am standing at one side of the room, and on the other there is an object (say a red car), which I can`t see. Why can`t I see it?? Is it because the car isn`t emitting any photons, or that it is, but I just can`t see them.

I remember reading a similar post somewhere (not sure if it was on this forum or not) where somebody replied that I couldn`t see the car as my eyes weren`t used to the darkness or something, and that after a while, after my eyes had adjusted it would become visible. This doesn`t make sense to me, as I would have thought that this could only happen if there was at least *some* light in the room, which there isn`t (remember, no keyholes!)

Now, I take a torch and shine a beam of light at the car. Now I can see it, what has changed?? Is it that the light from the torch is being reflected off the car back to me, or that the light 'stimulates' the car, so that it emits photons back to me (and presumably in every direction).

help would be appreciated...
 
Science news on Phys.org
Well, in a completely dark room, there are no visible wavelength photons present, so you can't see a thing.

(there could be IR, gamma rays or whatever)

A torch produces light across the whole visible spectrum. When you see an object, you see reflected light. The red object reflects photons with the appropriate wavelength - red ones.
 
Actually, there are visible wavelength photons! Your eyes just aren't sensitive enough to see them - no matter how long you wait for your eyes to adjust.
 
thanks for the replies

So, when the torch is turned on the light (photons) from the torch go to the red car. They hit the car and reflect back to my eyes in the form of photons of a particular wavelength correcponding to red light. Is this right?? Are they the same photons emitted from the torch, or are they 'new' ones generated by the car??

I have a bit of confusion over the difference between reflecting photons (the car, or anything else), and producing photons (the torch/the sun etc.)

Thanks again
 
Yes, when you shine your torch the very same photons come back, strike your retina and you see!

Generally, "new photons" come from incandescence, phosphorescence or fluorescence or some similar process.
 
Tide said:
Yes, when you shine your torch the very same photons come back, strike your retina and you see!

Generally, "new photons" come from incandescence, phosphorescence or fluorescence or some similar process.

Although there are many who would say that "reflection" involves the absorption of the photons by the reflecting surface, which then emits photons. Whether those are the "very same photons" is open to interpretation!
 
Incandescence phosphorescence or fluorescence don't necessarily emit the same way they absorb (absorption of two low frequency photons => emission of a high frequency one for example).

With reflection, what is emitted is identical to what is absorbed (except for direction).

When you shout and there is an echo, do you say that the reflected voice is the "same" voice" or a "new" voice?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"I would say "new", caused by wall vibrations."

Wouldn't a wall with infinite mass and stiffness (one that couldn't vibrate or move) still reflect sound waves though?
 
Good point, I edited that out. AFAIK, infinite wall mass means perfect reflexion with a 180 phase shift.
 
  • #10
Of course, if the car were hot (not just the 'Gone in 60 seconds' kind of hot!), you could see it with your own eyes, just as you can see an incandescent light globe, or an electric space heater, or a poker pulled from the fire, or ...

(mind you, it may not be a good idea to try to drive a car that's hot enough to see by its own thermal radiation!)
 
  • #11
Nereid said:
Of course, if the car were hot (not just the 'Gone in 60 seconds' kind of hot!), you could see it with your own eyes, just as you can see an incandescent light globe, or an electric space heater, or a poker pulled from the fire, or ...

(mind you, it may not be a good idea to try to drive a car that's hot enough to see by its own thermal radiation!)

Thanks for the answers, but...

Does that Thermal radiation you mention occur due to the atoms shaking about so much (as the car is really hot) that the atoms start to emit photons??

So, If I`m getting this correctly, when I shine a photon at a car, the photon hits the atoms in the car, and shakes them about a bit (obviously not the technical term!), which makes them emit a 'new' photon. - This is reflection -- Correct??

Wheras, if a car gets really hot, the atoms are moving about so much that they emit photons all by themselves (and the hotter they get, the more they move around which changes the wavelength which enables the radiation to be red hot, or white hot etc??) --this is emmision of light. -- Correct??

Am I off the mark here?

Thanks

P.S.
 
  • #12
Tide said:
Actually, there are visible wavelength photons! Your eyes just aren't sensitive enough to see them - no matter how long you wait for your eyes to adjust.

If the photons are of a visible wavelength, why aren't they visible?

Or do you mean that humans can't detect them but some animals can?

Visible light implies that humans can see it, no?

Afterall, all EM radiation can be detected somehow, whether it's by a mechanical device or by an evolved biological specimen such as a human.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
primal schemer said:
Thanks for the answers, but...

Does that Thermal radiation you mention occur due to the atoms shaking about so much (as the car is really hot) that the atoms start to emit photons??

Close. As the car gets hot, the atoms do "shake about". This causes the atoms to jump to a higher state and then -- when they drop to a lower state -- they radiate photons. This is known as blackbody radiation.

Here is a link that talks about it.
So, If I`m getting this correctly, when I shine a photon at a car, the photon hits the atoms in the car, and shakes them about a bit (obviously not the technical term!), which makes them emit a 'new' photon. - This is reflection -- Correct??
Basically.
Wheras, if a car gets really hot, the atoms are moving about so much that they emit photons all by themselves (and the hotter they get, the more they move around which changes the wavelength which enables the radiation to be red hot, or white hot etc??) --this is emmision of light. -- Correct??

Again you are describing blackbody radiation, and your understanding is basically correct.

subodei said:
If the photons are of a visible wavelength, why aren't they visible?

As discussed in the link that I gave, a room-temperature object will emit visible light, but the amount of visible light is so low that our eyes cannot detect it even when dark-adapted. As you heat the object, a larger about of light will be emitted in the visible and the object will start to glow.
 
  • #14
subodei said:
If the photons are of a visible wavelength, why aren't they visible?

Or do you mean that humans can't detect them but some animals can?

Visible light implies that humans can see it, no?

Afterall, all EM radiation can be detected somehow, whether it's by a mechanical device or by an evolved biological specimen such as a human.

I meant simply that there aren't enough of them to fire the rods and cones on your retina and produce a neural response adequate to perceive them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 207 ·
7
Replies
207
Views
16K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K