Epsilon Delta Proof, need clarification

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an epsilon-delta proof concerning the limit of the function \( \frac{1}{x} \) as \( x \) approaches a non-zero constant \( c \). Participants are exploring the steps involved in establishing the proof and clarifying specific aspects of the reasoning presented.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the bounding of the factor \( \frac{1}{|x|} \) and its implications for the proof. Questions are raised about the transitions between expressions in the proof, particularly regarding the manipulation of absolute values. There is also discussion on how to appropriately choose the value of \( \delta \) to satisfy the conditions of the proof.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the reasoning behind the proof steps, particularly focusing on the intervals around \( c \) that avoid zero and the implications for bounding \( \frac{1}{|x|} \). There is an ongoing exploration of how these bounds relate to the choice of \( \delta \) and the overall structure of the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that since \( c \neq 0 \), there exists a region around \( c \) that does not include zero, which is crucial for bounding \( \frac{1}{|x|} \). The discussion also touches on the need for careful selection of \( z \) to ensure the interval around \( c \) remains valid.

haribol
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Prove that

[tex] lim_{x \rightarrow c} \ \ \frac{1}{x}=\frac{1}{c} \ ,c\neq0[/tex]

Proof

We must find [tex]\delta[/tex] such that:

1.

[tex] 0<|x-c|<\delta \ \Rightarrow \ | \ \frac{1}{x}=\frac{1}{c}|<\epsilon[/tex]

Now,

2.

[tex]| \ \frac{1}{x}=\frac{1}{c}|=| \ \frac{c-x}{xc}|= \frac{1}{|x|} \cdot \frac{1}{|c|} \cdot |x-c|[/tex]

The factor [tex]\frac{1}{|x|}[/tex] is not good if its near 0. We can bound this factor if x can be away from 0. Note:

3.

[tex] |c|=|c-x+x| \leq |c-x|+|x|[/tex]

so

4.

[tex] |x| \geq |c|-|x-c|[/tex]

Thus if we choose

5.

[tex] \delta \leq \frac{|c|}{2}[/tex]

6.

then we can succeed in making
[tex] |x| \geq \frac{|c|}{2}[/tex]

Finally, if we also require

7.

[tex]\delta \leq \frac{\epsilon c^2}{2}[/tex]

then,

8.

[tex] \frac {1}{|x|} \cdot \frac{1}{|c|} \cdot |x-c| < \frac {1}{|c|} \cdot \frac {1}{|c|/2} \cdot \frac{\epsilon c^2}{2} = \epsilon[/tex]


My questions

1. On step 2, its said to "bound" the factor 1/|x|. What does this mean?

2.How did the |c-x| on step 3 went to |x-c| on step 4?

3. How did they choose [tex]\delta[/tex] to be that value?

Any help on this subject is very much appreciated, thank you in advance.

This example is from "Calculus 8th Edition" by Varberg, Purcell and Rigdon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Since c doesn't equal 0, there exists a (tiny) region about c which doesn't contain 0. This region is what we care about.
2. The negative of the first difference has equal magnitude as the difference itself.
 
Some more thoughts...

1. As Arnildo wrote, as c!=0, there is an interval
I:=[c-z,c+z]
that doesn't contain the origin. If you like, z can be half the distance between c and 0 to ensure
a. if c<0 that c+z<0
b. if c>0 that c-z>0.

z could also be 3/4 the distance between 0 and c or some such. A picture might be helpful.

On I, 1/|x| can be "bounded" which means that we can find a number M such that for x in I, 1/|x| <= M. You can find a formula for M depending on c and z but NOT x. This M is used in step 8 somewhere.

You have |1/x - 1/c| < (M/|c|) |x-c| < (M/|c|) delta.

Then if delta = epsilon * (|c|/M), then we'd have that for an epsilon>0 there is a delta such that if |x-c|<delta, then |1/x-1/c|<epsilon.
 
Thank you very much guys
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K