Register to reply

Julian Assange Out On Bail.

by nismaratwork
Tags: assange, julian, julian assange, manning, wikileaks
Share this thread:
nismaratwork
#1
Dec16-10, 08:04 AM
P: 2,284
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe...pt=T1&iref=BN1

Well, the title of the thread pretty much says it all. I think it's going to be interesting to see if he flees or stays, and how the extradition plays out.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
Jack21222
#2
Dec16-10, 08:15 AM
P: 772
Quote Quote by nismaratwork View Post
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe...pt=T1&iref=BN1

Well, the title of the thread pretty much says it all. I think it's going to be interesting to see if he flees or stays, and how the extradition plays out.
I think he'll stay. As the judge points out, he has some interest in clearing his name. Plus, he gets to hang out in a mansion in the meantime.
nismaratwork
#3
Dec16-10, 08:25 AM
P: 2,284
Quote Quote by Jack21222 View Post
I think he'll stay. As the judge points out, he has some interest in clearing his name. Plus, he gets to hang out in a mansion in the meantime.
I agree.

JaredJames
#4
Dec16-10, 09:18 AM
P: 3,387
Julian Assange Out On Bail.

I was under the impression he was tagged?

EDIT: He is.

Plus he doesn't have his passport.
Gokul43201
#5
Dec16-10, 10:04 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,155
If I go there will be trouble
And if I stay it will be double


Probably the other way round, in this case.
nismaratwork
#6
Dec16-10, 12:48 PM
P: 2,284
Quote Quote by Gokul43201 View Post
If I go there will be trouble
And if I stay it will be double


Probably the other way round, in this case.
Yeah, I wouldn't want to be him right now, whatever the reason to be in that situation. Still, he's worrying about extradition to Sweden instead of eating Polonium soup soooo... life isn't all bad!
Mathnomalous
#7
Dec16-10, 02:30 PM
P: 199
Here is the NY Times article on the matter:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/17/wo...ange.html?_r=1

The comments section is a virtual pro-Assange "forum:"

http://community.nytimes.com/comment...ldest&offset=2

Good to see the UK growing some spheres and standing up to the US, for once. And nothing like seeing Obama and the US Government receiving the proverbial "slap on the face."
Gokul43201
#8
Dec16-10, 04:25 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,155
Quote Quote by Mathnomalous View Post
Good to see the UK growing some spheres and standing up to the US, for once. And nothing like seeing Obama and the US Government receiving the proverbial "slap on the face."
Don't you mean "standing up to Sweden"? I wasn't aware the US had an interest or opinion on the sex charges.
nismaratwork
#9
Dec16-10, 04:29 PM
P: 2,284
Quote Quote by Gokul43201 View Post
Don't you mean "standing up to Sweden"? I wasn't aware the US had an interest or opinion on the sex charges.
None that I know of... the USA wasn't him on charges relating to espionage I suspect. Sweden gets him first however... and...

just a thought for all the people convinced that Assange is being set up...

...

What if he isn't? What if, and lets just throw it out there, he's actually broken the laws of Sweden as a temporary resident, and has to answer for it? Just a thought.
Gokul43201
#10
Dec16-10, 04:36 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,155
Quote Quote by nismaratwork View Post
just a thought for all the people convinced that Assange is being set up...

...

What if he isn't? What if, and lets just throw it out there, he's actually broken the laws of Sweden as a temporary resident, and has to answer for it? Just a thought.
And there's no inconsistency in thinking his work as a whistle-blower is noble and just, while his actions with women may not be ... yet I get the impression that those who support his political positions are also the ones who are convinced of his innocence in the sex charges.
nismaratwork
#11
Dec16-10, 04:43 PM
P: 2,284
Quote Quote by Gokul43201 View Post
And there's no inconsistency in thinking his work as a whistle-blower is noble and just, while his actions with women may not be ... yet I get the impression that those who support his political positions are also the ones who are convinced of his innocence in the sex charges.
Precisely! He could be a man who truly believes in what he's doing, and a rapist. Or, he could be any combination and permutation of related possibilities... who knows? As you say, this is basically an issue if you assume a priori that the US has Sweden on a leash somehow.
Mathnomalous
#12
Dec16-10, 04:56 PM
P: 199
Quote Quote by Gokul43201 View Post
And there's no inconsistency in thinking his work as a whistle-blower is noble and just, while his actions with women may not be ... yet I get the impression that those who support his political positions are also the ones who are convinced of his innocence in the sex charges.
You are entitled to your belief system. Here is an excerpt from a BBC article:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12005930

Quote Quote by BBC
Mr Assange is accused of having unprotected sex with a woman, identified only as Miss A, when she insisted he use a condom.

He is also accused of having unprotected sex with another woman, Miss W, while she was asleep.
He is probably guilty of the first accusation; I am doubtful about the second. But, that is up to Swedish courts to decide. Both accusations are irrelevant within the bigger picture; whether Assange is innocent or guilty of those accusations, the information released by Wikileaks does not change.

What Assange needs to do now is develop some obscure medical condition. If the UK fails to extradite a certified tyrant (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/599526.stm), Assange should be comfortably safe.
Proton Soup
#13
Dec16-10, 05:51 PM
P: 1,070
Quote Quote by Gokul43201 View Post
And there's no inconsistency in thinking his work as a whistle-blower is noble and just, while his actions with women may not be ... yet I get the impression that those who support his political positions are also the ones who are convinced of his innocence in the sex charges.
what if you're not convinced of the legitimacy of sweden's sex laws? personally, i don't view women as retarded children that have to be protected from themselves. if the woman wants to use a condom, then she should assert herself and not have sex.
nismaratwork
#14
Dec16-10, 06:26 PM
P: 2,284
Quote Quote by Proton Soup View Post
what if you're not convinced of the legitimacy of sweden's sex laws? personally, i don't view women as retarded children that have to be protected from themselves. if the woman wants to use a condom, then she should assert herself and not have sex.
I think you're right about women, and not using a condom isn't a crime, but that's not exactly what's alleged.

According to a statement from British police, Assange has been “accused by the Swedish authorities of one count of unlawful coercion, two counts of sexual molestation and one count of rape, all alleged to have been committed in August 2010.” The charges stem from two women who both say that their sexual encounters with Assange began as consensual but became nonconsensual after he stopped using a condom.
So, he used a condom, then took it off and the women protested? That's still not kosher Proton, if she says stop at any point you have to stop. I also note that there is a difference between getting in bed with someone unprotected, and having that person whip off the condom mid-coitus.

Frankly, the latter is creepy and dangerous...

edit: source quote: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/12...ed_in_bri.html
Proton Soup
#15
Dec16-10, 07:39 PM
P: 1,070
Quote Quote by nismaratwork View Post
I think you're right about women, and not using a condom isn't a crime, but that's not exactly what's alleged.



So, he used a condom, then took it off and the women protested? That's still not kosher Proton, if she says stop at any point you have to stop. I also note that there is a difference between getting in bed with someone unprotected, and having that person whip off the condom mid-coitus.

Frankly, the latter is creepy and dangerous...

edit: source quote: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/12...ed_in_bri.html
see, this is what i'm talking about. "unlawful coercion" ? meaning what exactly, he talked them into doing something, like not using a condom? i don't know what any of this PC crap even means. is molestation touching her pudenda without explicitly asking first "may i now touch your pudenda?" it all sounds like some of the feminist overregulation crap that was circulating on college campuses a while back. but if you want to talk creepy, i thought some of the stuff coming from the females leading up to these encounters seemed a little stalkerish.

in any case, i don't find these women credible. you'd think as long as julian's been around, if he were really some kind of rapist that this would have come up before.
nismaratwork
#16
Dec16-10, 07:50 PM
P: 2,284
Quote Quote by Proton Soup View Post
see, this is what i'm talking about. "unlawful coercion" ? meaning what exactly, he talked them into doing something, like not using a condom? i don't know what any of this PC crap even means. is molestation touching her pudenda without explicitly asking first "may i now touch your pudenda?" it all sounds like some of the feminist overregulation crap that was circulating on college campuses a while back. but if you want to talk creepy, i thought some of the stuff coming from the females leading up to these encounters seemed a little stalkerish.

in any case, i don't find these women credible. you'd think as long as julian's been around, if he were really some kind of rapist that this would have come up before.
I find that I'm not in a position to judge the credibility of these women, Assange, or the worth of the law. Nobody seems to know the exact details of the case, and just because there is such a thing is overly PC views of sex doesn't mean he couldn't be some creep who likes to disrobe 'king willy' mid-stream. I'm not in the mood to get into some kind of class on unreported crimes, and it's entirely possible that he did nothing wrong... who knows...
not me.
not you.
lisab
#17
Dec16-10, 08:06 PM
Mentor
lisab's Avatar
P: 2,990
Quote Quote by Mathnomalous View Post
He is probably guilty of the first accusation; I am doubtful about the second. But, that is up to Swedish courts to decide. Both accusations are irrelevant within the bigger picture; whether Assange is innocent or guilty of those accusations, the information released by Wikileaks does not change.
Re the bolded part of your post: why do you believe that?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Fox News Pundits Call for Julian Assange's Assassination Current Events 77
Static Equilibrium - When will this guy bail off his ladder? Introductory Physics Homework 6
House votes down bail-out package Current Events 44
Should the government bail out GM? Current Events 59
About julian days Astronomy & Astrophysics 4