Potential energy of a charge system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of potential energy in a system of charges, particularly focusing on the symmetry of the potential energy formula and its implications for understanding the energy characteristics of charge systems. The context includes theoretical aspects relevant to electromagnetism and potential energy definitions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the relationship between potential energy and the symmetry of the formula regarding charges.
  • Another participant explains that potential energy is defined for a system rather than individual charges, using examples like the electron-proton system.
  • A further contribution highlights that the symmetry in the formula indicates that it does not distinguish between different particles, reinforcing the idea that potential energy pertains to the system as a whole.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the notion that potential energy is a characteristic of a system of charges, but the specific relationship between this concept and the symmetry of the formula remains a point of inquiry for some.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the deeper implications of the symmetry in the formula, leaving open questions about its significance in understanding potential energy.

agolkar
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm new to the forum and I congratulate with everyone of here for the nice scientific forum you've set up :smile:
I apologize in advance for my poor english (especially about scientific terms!), but I hope I can explain my doubt. I'm currently studying for the Electromagnetism exam for my aerospace engineering degree.

After the enunciation of the formula of the potential energy for a charge system (U=1/2 1/(4*pi*epsilon) etc..), in my book I read the following statement about the topic in subject:

"it comes back the simmetric structure regarding the charges, that corresponds the fact that the potential energy of a charge system in every possible configuration is a characteristic of the system in its complex".

The original text in italian is the following (for the curious ones :biggrin: ):

"torna di nuovo la struttura simmetrica rispetto alle cariche, che
corrisponde all'essere l'energia potenziale di un sistema di cariche in ogni
sua possibile configurazione una caratteristica del sistema nel suo insieme


The same assertion about the symmetry regarding the charges is made when introducting the potential energy itself... anyway I cannot understand the point :frown: can someone help me, please?

Thanks in advance :smile:
Alessandro
 
Physics news on Phys.org
electric potential energy

Well, if I understand what you meant, here is the answer.

The author is trying to say that the potential energy is defined only for a system. For example, potential energy of a group of charges, potential energy of the earth-stone system. You can't say potential energy of the electron, rather, potenitial energy of the electron-proton system.

I hope it helps. Tell me if you meant something else.


spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
thank you for your answer :)
yes, i think that's the point.
but i cannot understand the relation of it with the symmetry of the formula regarding the charges... any idea?

thanks again :smile:
 
symmetry and Electric potential energy

Agolkar,

If you look at the formula, you observe that by looking at it, you cannot tell whether you have written the potential energy of Particle A or Particle B.
That is, the formula is symmetric with A and B. ( or with all the charges if there are many ).

So, that means, potential energy is not for a particle. Rather, for a system. And the formula tells that too.

spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
thanks! :cool: i understood!
very clever :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
22K