Solving Inequality Problem: (|a|+|b|≥2(|c|+|d|))

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter drago
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inequality problem defined by |a| + |b| ≥ 2(|c| + |d|) and its implications for proving (c + a)² + (d + b)² ≥ c² + d². Participants agree that while the original inequality suggests a stronger conclusion, proving it directly remains challenging. A weaker result was achieved by assuming |b| ≥ |a| and |c| ≥ |d|, indicating that additional constraints can simplify the proof but at the cost of generality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real number inequalities
  • Familiarity with absolute value properties
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation and proof techniques
  • Experience with mathematical reasoning and logical deduction
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced techniques in inequality proofs
  • Study the implications of absolute value in inequalities
  • Research methods for generalizing results in mathematical proofs
  • Learn about optimization techniques in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in advanced inequality proofs and algebraic reasoning.

drago
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I would appreciate some ideas on the following problem:

We are given the inequality:
(1)
|a| + |b| >= 2(|c| + |d|)

Can we conclude that:
(2)
(c + a)^2 + (d + b)^2 >= c^2 + d^2 ?

a, b, c, d are real.

I can prove (2) if (1) is in the form: |a| + |b| >= 4max(|c|,|d|), but the above is stronger.

Thank you.
drago
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
i feel its true
its seems so easy but at 12.30 midnight i cannot think of anything! :frown:

-- AI
 
i feel its true
its seems so easy but at 12.30 midnight i cannot think of anything!

Yep I looked at it for a few minutes late last night and thought it looked easy but couldn't come up with much. I got another weaker result pretty easy but then decided to leave it for someone else.

BTW, I got the weaker result by assumming (without loss of generality) that |b| >= |a|. I then found that if I made the additional imposition that |c|>=|d| then I was able to prove the desired result pretty easily . This however definitely does give a loss of generality and hence a weaker result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K