Collision between two moving objects (one with a nonknown trajectory)?by Iximeow Tags: collision, moving, nonknown, objects, trajectory 

#1
Jan311, 01:02 AM

P: 2

Alright, I've been working on this on my spare time for the past few weeks, and have a solution that ~works~, but I'm not happy with at all.
The general idea is to have two objects, A and B, where A's velocity and position are known, B's position and speed are known, but the direction B travels in can vary. I want to find where and when the two objects will collide, before even considering if it can happen at all. Going to type out my math as it's simpler than just explaining it all in Engrish. Ax, Bx = A's xposition, B's xposition Ay, By = similarly, A's yposition, B's yposition Avx, Avy = A's xvelocity, yvelocity B = B's speed My solution thus far has been to find the distance from B to A, D1: sqrt({BxAx}^2+{ByAy}^2) Then taking B, and dividing D1 by it, giving T1 = D1/B Then finding the distance from B to A(T1), D2: sqrt({BxAxAvx*T1}^2+{ByAyAvy*T1}^2) Again, distance divided by B, gives a better distance to correct for: T2 = D2/B Then finding D3: sqrt({BxAxAvx*T2}^2+{ByAyAvy*T2}^2) etc etc continuing on until Tn gets sufficiently small that I don't need to get closer, then having Tn and A(Tn), knowing that A(Tn) is close enough to the collision point I'm looking for. Initially, before I did the math, I was hoping to get something that I could use a limit for as n > infinity, and get a precise answer, but from the way the math expands.. I'm pretty sure I can't do that? If anyone knows what I may or may not be doing wrong, or a better way of finding this, I'd love you forever? :D 



#2
Jan311, 02:45 AM

P: 2

... Don't mind me; reworking an idea I had a while back to use the law of sines gave a good answer.
Setting up a triangle with A and B's position as vertices, the collision point C as the third vertex, then knowing that AC = Bv*t, BC = Av*t, and easily finding the angle by A, and using the law of sines to know sin(A)/(Bv*t) = sin(B)/(Av*t). The t drops out, and then the angle by B is simple to find, which makes the problem into finding the intersection of two lines, and a bit more simple math to find how long it takes for one of the two objects to get to C. Yay, precise answers. Now just wondering if AB/t has any realworld meaning or use.. hmm... 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Trajectory of charged particle moving in a magnetic field  Classical Physics  4  
Objects moving in a plane.  Introductory Physics Homework  12  
few random questions collision, circular orbit, trajectory, etc  Introductory Physics Homework  2  
objects moving in 2D  Introductory Physics Homework  9  
Moving objects in space  General Physics  2 