Register to reply

I am unhappy about the answer to this problem

by flyingpig
Tags: unhappy
Share this thread:
flyingpig
#1
Jan16-11, 12:46 AM
P: 2,568
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



In the figure above, determine the point (other than infinity) at which the electric field is zero. Given q1 = -2.50[tex]\mu[/tex]C and q2 = 6.00[tex]\mu[/tex]C

Solution: 1.82m to the left of q1


3. The attempt at a solution

So I set it up as

[tex]\frac{q_{1}}{x^2} = \frac{q_{2}}{(d-x)^2}[/tex] where is x is the point I am looking for

After some simplification

[tex]q_{1}d^2 - 2dq_{1}x + x^2(q_{1} - q{2}) = 0 [/tex]

Here is what hit me, if I was only going to concern about the magnitude, I would get x = -1.82m and 0.39m

First of all, I am not even sure why it is -1.82m and not 0.39. Isn't -1.82m outside the range of d = 1.00m?

Secondly, if I do not concern with the magnitude (using -2.50C instead of 2.50C), I couldn't even solve the quadratic.

So why must I use positive 2.50C? And why is it -1.82m and not 0.39m?

Thanks!
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Security CTO to detail Android Fake ID flaw at Black Hat
Huge waves measured for first time in Arctic Ocean
Mysterious molecules in space
Pengwuino
#2
Jan16-11, 01:21 AM
PF Gold
Pengwuino's Avatar
P: 7,120
Recall that an electric field will give rise to a force on this charged particle you plan on introducing at some position 'x'. So you've sent to find where the field and thus, the force would vanish. If it is indeed 0.39m to the right of q1... how would that physically be possible?

If you introduced a test charge that is negative, it would receive a pull from q2 and a push from q1 - obviously not a point of vanishing electric field. If the test charge is positive, the opposite occurs - the charge receives a push from q2 and a pull from q1. This point can't be a point with no electric field.

Now consider the -1.83m position (or really, just look at the left side of q1) and run through the same arguments and hopefully you can see why the charge has to be on the left side of q1.

The charge does not have to be placed in between the charges. Infact, if q1 and q2 are of opposite charge, there exists no point between the charges with 0 electric field by the argument above. If q1 and q2 are of the same charge, the only two points of 0 electric field are in between q1 and q2.
flyingpig
#3
Jan16-11, 01:08 PM
P: 2,568
Quote Quote by Pengwuino View Post
Recall that an electric field will give rise to a force on this charged particle you plan on introducing at some position 'x'. So you've sent to find where the field and thus, the force would vanish. If it is indeed 0.39m to the right of q1... how would that physically be possible?
Of course it could!




If you introduced a test charge that is negative, it would receive a pull from q2 and a push from q1 - obviously not a point of vanishing electric field. If the test charge is positive, the opposite occurs - the charge receives a push from q2 and a pull from q1. This point can't be a point with no electric field.

Now consider the -1.83m position (or really, just look at the left side of q1) and run through the same arguments and hopefully you can see why the charge has to be on the left side of q1.
If it is to left for real

1) A positive test charge would be attracted to the negative charge q1, but the charge q2 is greater, but also further and hence would make a "0" net charge

2) A negative test charge would be repelled by q1, at the same time attracted to q2

The charge does not have to be placed in between the charges. Infact, if q1 and q2 are of opposite charge, there exists no point between the charges with 0 electric field by the argument above. If q1 and q2 are of the same charge, the only two points of 0 electric field are in between q1 and q2.
But, just going back to my quadratic, why does only magnitudes of the charge work?

gneill
#4
Jan16-11, 04:18 PM
Mentor
P: 11,621
I am unhappy about the answer to this problem

Quote Quote by flyingpig View Post
1) A positive test charge would be attracted to the negative charge q1, but the charge q2 is greater, but also further and hence would make a "0" net charge
But q2 is a positive charge. It would repel your test charge, pushing it towards q1 which is also attracting it. It would not be a "0" net field (not charge!). It would not be a point of no force for the positive test charge.

2) A negative test charge would be repelled by q1, at the same time attracted to q2
Right. So not a zero force point for the negative test charge either.

But, just going back to my quadratic, why does only magnitudes of the charge work?
You're already encapsulating the geometry of the situation into the equation. In particular, you're taking into account the directions of the fields caused by each charge in relation to their placement when you write the equation the way you did.

If you wanted to make your life more difficult you could write an equation that would make no assumptions about polarity of charge and the resulting force directions as you move from one side of a charge to another. This would necessarily be a vector equation. Then you could spend a quiet hour or two figuring out how to work vectors into a quadratic equation...
flyingpig
#5
Jan21-11, 09:55 PM
P: 2,568
Could you dumb that last bit for me?
Liquidxlax
#6
Jan21-11, 11:42 PM
P: 321
remember the electric field of a positive charge flows outwards and negative flows inwards. so you should have to be on the right of 2 or on the left of 1 to cancel out the e field




q1 and q2 are of different magnitudes and different sign
Pengwuino
#7
Jan22-11, 12:01 AM
PF Gold
Pengwuino's Avatar
P: 7,120
Don't confuse force with charge.

If the charged particle is placed between Q1 and Q2 being pushed from Q1 and pulled from Q2 (thus, a negative test charge), the forces are adding and the result is a particle accelerating to the right. With a positive test charge, it would be pulled to the left and pushed from the right.
Liquidxlax
#8
Jan22-11, 12:04 AM
P: 321
Quote Quote by Pengwuino View Post
Don't confuse force with charge.

If the charged particle is placed between Q1 and Q2 being pushed from Q1 and pulled from Q2 (thus, a negative test charge), the forces are adding and the result is a particle accelerating to the right. With a positive test charge, it would be pulled to the left and pushed from the right.
my bad, its 2am... ignore my post then
Delphi51
#9
Jan22-11, 12:15 AM
HW Helper
P: 3,394
In your first equation in the first post, the (d - x) assumes the point is between the charges. Use (d + x) to get the answer.
SammyS
#10
Jan22-11, 02:15 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 7,801
Quote Quote by flyingpig View Post
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



In the figure above, determine the point (other than infinity) at which the electric field is zero. Given q1 = -2.50[tex]\mu[/tex]C and q2 = 6.00[tex]\mu[/tex]C

Solution: 1.82m to the left of q1


3. The attempt at a solution

So I set it up as

[tex]\frac{q_{1}}{x^2} = \frac{q_{2}}{(d-x)^2}[/tex] where is x is the point I am looking for

After some simplification

[tex]q_{1}d^2 - 2dq_{1}x + x^2(q_{1} - q_{2}) = 0 [/tex]

Here is what hit me, if I was only going to concern about the magnitude, I would get x = -1.82m and 0.39m

First of all, I am not even sure why it is -1.82m and not 0.39. Isn't -1.82m outside the range of d = 1.00m?

Secondly, if I do not concern with the magnitude (using -2.50C instead of 2.50C), I couldn't even solve the quadratic.

So why must I use positive 2.50C? And why is it -1.82m and not 0.39m?

Thanks!
Hi flying pig.

To the left of q1, which is at x = 0, the electric field due to q1 is:

[tex]E_1=-k\frac{q_1}{x^2}\,.[/tex]

To the right of q1, the electric field due to q1 is:

[tex]E_1=k\frac{q_1}{x^2}\,.[/tex]


Similarly, to the left of q2, which is at x = d, the electric field due to q2 is:

[tex]E_2=-k\frac{q_2}{\left(x-d\right)^2}\,.[/tex]

To the right of q2, the electric field due to q2 is:

[tex]E_2=k\frac{q_2}{\left(x-d\right)^2}\,.[/tex]

The vector nature of the electric field in the above, is indicated by the signs. The effect of the signs of the charges on the electric field is built in.

The problem asks you to find a finite value of x at which the electric field is zero. That is:

[tex]\text{Solve }E_1+E_2=0[/tex]

To the left of both charges and to the right of both charges:

[tex]k\frac{q_1}{x^2}+k\frac{q_2}{\left(x-d\right)^2}=0\quad\to\quad \frac{q_1}{x^2}=-\frac{q_2}{\left(x-d\right)^2}\,.[/tex]
The RHS has the opposite sign of the RHS of your equation. However, IF you only consider magnitude (Why would you do that?), this is equivalent to your equation. Of course, the only way for this equation to be true, is for q1q2<0.

Between the charges:

[tex]k\frac{q_1}{x^2}-k\frac{q_2}{\left(x-d\right)^2}=0\,.[/tex]
This only has a solution if q1q2>0.
flyingpig
#11
Jan22-11, 05:04 PM
P: 2,568
It's more confusing if you use x - d even though the end result is the same because of the square

But why would I use (d+x)? I am really confused.
Delphi51
#12
Jan22-11, 07:03 PM
HW Helper
P: 3,394
Sorry! I was thinking of x as a positive number. Your d-x is great; x just comes out to a negative number to indicate a point left of the origin.
flyingpig
#13
Jan22-11, 07:33 PM
P: 2,568
I read Sammy's post over and over again which seems to be answering my question, but it just doesn't hit my head yet.
flyingpig
#14
Jan22-11, 09:43 PM
P: 2,568
Wait, I found this link

http://www.jca.umbc.edu/~george/html...hys112_hk1.pdf, go to question 27.

It's answering about the "magnitude" part, but really isn't telling me WHHY

I got the idea that it is a negative and positive attraction and it therefore would never make sense if it was x = 0.39 (why DOESN'T it make sense though? The math says it can)
Pengwuino
#15
Jan22-11, 10:07 PM
PF Gold
Pengwuino's Avatar
P: 7,120
Quote Quote by flyingpig View Post
I got the idea that it is a negative and positive attraction and it therefore would never make sense if it was x = 0.39 (why DOESN'T it make sense though? The math says it can)
The math doesn't care about the physics. One of the skills you must build up is determining what solutions make sense and which do not. This is kind one of those cases.

Also, I didn't notice it but you asked why you must use the magnitudes of the charges. Well, for one, you equate two equations with strictly positive denominators. If one side has a charge that is negative and one that is positive, there's no way they can be equal simply because one is always positive and one is always negative.

Compute the forces at the point near the middle. They will be equal but in the same direction so it's not a solution.
flyingpig
#16
Jan23-11, 05:07 PM
P: 2,568
Quote Quote by Pengwuino View Post
The math doesn't care about the physics. One of the skills you must build up is determining what solutions make sense and which do not. This is kind one of those cases.
Sammy made me just realize something last night.

The forces are attractive and hence x can and should never be x = 0.39m even though the math worked out because I am saying there exists a charge in the middle such that the E-field is 0. But what does x = 0.39m mean then?

So when the charges are repulsive, it would be right to use d - x, but otherwise, d + x?


Also, I didn't notice it but you asked why you must use the magnitudes of the charges. Well, for one, you equate two equations with strictly positive denominators. If one side has a charge that is negative and one that is positive, there's no way they can be equal simply because one is always positive and one is always negative.
That makes so much sense I didn't even see it, I will now repeat the fourth grade!
Delphi51
#17
Jan23-11, 05:57 PM
HW Helper
P: 3,394
I played with this some more and am surprised at how complicated it is!
I started with q1/x + q2/(d-x) = 0 and it worked perfectly, using the q1 = -2.5 and q2 = 6 and producing x = -1.82. Also a positive x spurious answer.

BUT if q1 happened to be a positive number so the solution is an x between 0 and 1, it would NOT work because both the q1/x and the q2/(d-x) are positive as if the E field from both charges is to the right. There should be a solution between 0 and 1 but my equation cannot find it.

I cannot think of a way to write the E1 + E2 = 0 equation that works for solutions in all three regions of x. The physicist must determine the zone where the solution lies before writing the equation!
flyingpig
#18
Jan23-11, 06:03 PM
P: 2,568
Alright, I set it up again, but I still can't solve it

[tex]-\frac{|q_{1}|}{x^2} = \frac{|q_{2}|}{(d+x)^2}[/tex]

[tex]-|q_{1}| + 2x|q_{1}|+ x^2(|q_{1}|- |q_{2}|) = 0[/tex]


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Unhappy with job, seeking advice! Career Guidance 3
Why are so many civil engineer unhappy ? Career Guidance 4
Statics Problem - Not sure why answer is answer Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 5
Is Capitalism Making Us Unhappy and Therfore Ill? General Discussion 24