Integrating through partial fractions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves integrating the function (dx)/[(x+3)^2 (x+1)^2] from 1 to 2, with the original poster attempting to use partial fractions for the integration process. They set up an equation to find coefficients for the partial fraction decomposition but encounter difficulties in solving for all coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of multiplying out the terms to find coefficients and suggest grouping terms by powers of x. There are questions about how to solve the resulting system of equations and whether plugging in values can simplify the process. Some participants propose alternative methods, such as differentiating the identity or performing the decomposition in stages.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being explored. Some participants have offered guidance on how to group terms and solve for coefficients, while others are questioning the feasibility of the proposed methods and suggesting alternative strategies. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the methods they can use. There is a focus on finding a solution without directly providing one, as per the forum's guidelines.

ACLerok
Messages
194
Reaction score
0
here's the problem, i am supposed to take the integral from 1 to 2 of this:

(dx)/[(X+3)^2 (x+1)^2]

I decided that the easiest way to compute it is by integrating by partial fractions so what i did was set up the equation:

A/(x+3) + B/[(x+3)^2] + C/(x+1) + D/[(X+1)^2] = 1

After this I multiplied by the common denominator and got:

[A(x+3)(x+1)^2] + [B(x+1)^2] + [C(x+1)(x+3)^2] + [D(x+3)^2] = 1

This is where I am stuck. I can get the values of coefficients B and D by pluggin in x=-3 and x=-1 respectively by I don't know how to find coefficients A and B. I tried multiplying everything out but that just made things more complicated and confusing.

Anyone kind enough to help me out?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiplying out works just fine, as long as you group your terms correctly:
Here's the coefficients for each power of x:
[tex]x^{3}:A+C[/tex]
[tex]x^{2}:5A+B+7C+D[/tex]
[tex]x^{1}:7A+2B+15C+6D[/tex]
[tex]x^{0}:3A+B+9C+9D[/tex]
In order for this polynomial to be identically equal to 1, we must solve the system:
A+C=0
5A+B+7C+D=0
7A+2B+15C+6D=0
3A+B+9C+9D=1

You ought to try again and group the terms in this manner.
Good luck!
 
i don't see how you can solve these questions with just one equation with two variables and the others with all four. Unless i am missing something...

arildno said:
Multiplying out works just fine, as long as you group your terms correctly:
Here's the coefficients for each power of x:
[tex]x^{3}:A+C[/tex]
[tex]x^{2}:5A+B+7C+D[/tex]
[tex]x^{1}:7A+2B+15C+6D[/tex]
[tex]x^{0}:3A+B+9C+9D[/tex]
In order for this polynomial to be identically equal to 1, we must solve the system:
A+C=0
5A+B+7C+D=0
7A+2B+15C+6D=0
3A+B+9C+9D=1

You ought to try again and group the terms in this manner.
Good luck!
 
You have 4 equations in 4 unknows, right?
Remember, your own equation:
[A(x+3)(x+1)^2] + [B(x+1)^2] + [C(x+1)(x+3)^2] + [D(x+3)^2] = 1

This must hold for ALL choices of x!
This is only possible if the coefficients before [tex]x^{3},x^{2},x[/tex] are all ZERO!
The constant term must equal 1.
 
It seems like a huge pain solving a system of four equations. However, sometimes what you can do (in this question for example) is plug in your own choices for x and then watch things cancel out. For example,

[A(x+3)(x+1)^2] + [B(x+1)^2] + [C(x+1)(x+3)^2] + [D(x+3)^2] = 1

If x = -3 than, A, C, D terms cancel out and you are left with
B(-3 + 1)^2 = 1. Thus, B = 1/4
You can do the same thing with x = -1. Now you only have a two variables to solve for. Not all that difficult or time consuming.
 
That's what he started with Parth Dave; he wanted another method..:wink:
 
Oh, uh... my mistake... next time I'll read everything :redface: .
 
Parth Dave said:
It seems like a huge pain solving a system of four equations. However, sometimes what you can do (in this question for example) is plug in your own choices for x and then watch things cancel out. For example,

[A(x+3)(x+1)^2] + [B(x+1)^2] + [C(x+1)(x+3)^2] + [D(x+3)^2] = 1

If x = -3 than, A, C, D terms cancel out and you are left with
B(-3 + 1)^2 = 1. Thus, B = 1/4
You can do the same thing with x = -1. Now you only have a two variables to solve for. Not all that difficult or time consuming.

HI. I suppose you've done this but one way to proceed further from Parth Dave's equation above is to realize that it is an identity for the quadruplet (A,B,C,D) that is to be found. Hence, you can differentiate both sides successively with respect to x. That will give you lower order algebraic equations that can be easily solved instead of comparing coefficients right from the start.

Cheers
Vivek
 
In solving for A and C, can i plug in the vaules of B and D in the system of equations to help solve for A and C?
 
  • #10
Why not do your partial fraction decomposition in two stages? E.g.

[tex]\left( \frac {1}{(x+1)(x+3)} \right)^2 = \frac {1}{4} \left( \frac {1}{x+1} - \frac {1}{x+3} \right)^2[/tex]

You can expand the square and do another partial fraction decomposition for the middle term.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K