Rotational Motion of a long pole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of a 3.3m long pole balanced vertically and pushed slightly, focusing on the speed of the upper end just before it contacts the ground. The initial potential energy (PE) is converted into kinetic energy (KE), with the equation derived as v = (1.5gh)^(1/2), where h is the height of the center of mass (1.65m). The correct approach involves recognizing that the pole rotates about its pivot point, leading to the use of the moment of inertia I_{end} = 1/3 M L^2 for calculating the rotational KE. The method of energy conservation is valid, but the details require adjustment to account for pure rotational motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational motion and angular velocity
  • Familiarity with the concepts of potential energy and kinetic energy
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia for different shapes
  • Basic principles of energy conservation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of moment of inertia for various geometries, particularly I_{end} = 1/3 M L^2
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in rotational dynamics
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular velocity in rotational systems
  • Investigate real-world applications of rotational motion in engineering and physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and engineers interested in rotational dynamics will benefit from this discussion.

Skomatth
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
A 3.3m long pole is balanced vertically on its tip. It is given a tiny push. What will be the speed of the upper end of the pole just before it hits the ground? Assume the lower end does not slip.

mgh=.5mv^2 + .5Iw^2 Initial PE = final KE translation + final KE rotational
v=rw, I=.33mr^2

Combine these equations and I got
v=(1.5gh)^(1/2)

Now I think this is the speed of the CM, located 1.65m above the ground (h=1.65). So to find the speed of the tip I covert v into radians per second and then multiply that by 3.3 to find speed of the tip.

Is this method correct? The book contains no answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your basic idea of using energy conservation is correct, but the details are not. The total KE of the rod as it hits the ground can be viewed as a combination of the translational KE of the CM plus the rotational KE about the CM. ([itex]I_{cm} = 1/12 M L^2[/itex])

A simpler approach is to realize that the stick is in pure rotational about the pivot point, thus the KE of the rod is just the rotational KE about the pivot point. ([itex]I_{end} = 1/3 M L^2[/itex])
 
Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
14K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K