Register to reply

From chaos to calm

by Loren Booda
Tags: calm, chaos
Share this thread:
Loren Booda
#1
Oct17-04, 10:47 PM
Loren Booda's Avatar
P: 3,408
Nonlinear mapping tends to maintain nonlinearity the farther its trajectory from a fixed point. Is there an example of a trajectory reverting to linearity after traversing a nonlinear region? I am especially interested in local, linear special relativity transitioning to global, nonlinear general relativity, and a possible converse.
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on Phys.org
Professor quantifies how 'one thing leads to another'
Team announces construction of a formal computer-verified proof of the Kepler conjecture
Iranian is first woman to win 'Nobel Prize of maths' (Update)
Tide
#2
Oct18-04, 12:05 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 3,144
Yes. Any object entering the Solar System from outside came from a linear trajectory, experiences a hyperbolic trajectory in the vicinity of the Sun and reverts to linear after it has left the Solar System.
Loren Booda
#3
Oct18-04, 11:00 AM
Loren Booda's Avatar
P: 3,408
Tide,

Does general relativity behave nonlinearly, yet not chaotically? I believe what I seek is a near-linear gravitational trajectory becoming a more chaotic one, then becoming near-linear again. Sorry for the confusion.

Tide
#4
Oct18-04, 11:13 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 3,144
From chaos to calm

I'm still not quite sure what you're looking for but here are a couple of ideas that I think resemble what you seem to be asking.

Some aspects of weather go from calm (normal weather) to chaotic behavior (hurricanes) and back again to calm.

Plasma waves can produce an "echo" meaning that when such a wave is launched it is well structured but as it propagates away it is damped (Landau damping). The wave disappears but later downstream the wave re-emerges. This process can repeat several times.

Regarding general relativity, the motion of objects (including light) close to a massive object can be chaotic but I am not aware of a situation where an object that enters close to the object (event horizon, e.g.) completely escapes.
Loren Booda
#5
Oct18-04, 05:39 PM
Loren Booda's Avatar
P: 3,408
Tide et al,

To repeat: from what I know, gravitation propagates along trajectories that are generally nonlinear yet nonchaotic. Is this right?
meteor
#6
Oct18-04, 05:52 PM
P: 915
Does general relativity behave nonlinearly, yet not chaotically?
Standard chaos theory seems not to work in GR, at least is what this paper claims
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9612017
so they are trying to develop a new definition of chaos useful in GR
Loren Booda
#7
Oct18-04, 08:53 PM
Loren Booda's Avatar
P: 3,408
Thanks, meteor. That's more toward what I was looking for.

Anyone want to define diffeomorphism invariance? All I know is that it is some kind of symmetry followed by GR.
Gokul43201
#8
Oct18-04, 09:42 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,155
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Diffeomorphism.html
http://relativity.livingreviews.org/...-1/node11.html
MathematicalPhysicist
#9
Oct19-04, 06:11 AM
P: 3,242
Quote Quote by meteor
Standard chaos theory seems not to work in GR, at least is what this paper claims
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9612017
so they are trying to develop a new definition of chaos useful in GR
how their work differ from nottale's work on scale relativity?

nottale's webpage:
http://www.chez.com/etlefevre/rechell/ukrechel.htm
Phantomas
#10
Oct19-04, 02:02 PM
P: 11
Hello all.
Just a few observations.
Our solar sisem is chaotic by nature (large time scail). Our life span is just too short for us to notice.
Also weather is chaotic by nature, that means that in calm weather and in mid huricane it is impossible to predict future events for distant future, even with lots of acure data (not equaly unpredictable, but still unpredistable).

@LorenBoda, So you are looking for transitional chaos in damped systems. I think if you want to include general relativity you'll have to be more specific, but there is an example of a transitional chaos involving gravity.

It is an experiment with three magnets (positioned at the corners of a tiangle) and an iron ball that hangs above them exactly at the center.

When you release the ball its movement is linear (it's a damped pendulum). When the amplitude weakens it becomes chaotic (it can't decide which magnet attracts it more). When amplutide weakens even more, it settles and osscilates arround one of the magnets (yt the beggining you can't tell which one).

I actualy did the experiment once, here is a picture:

Cheers, Phantomas
Attached Thumbnails
magnetic-small.jpg  
Loren Booda
#11
Oct19-04, 05:29 PM
Loren Booda's Avatar
P: 3,408
Phantomas,

What would be the pattern of motion if the magnet system were superconducting?

Gokul43201 and loop quantum gravity,

I will indulge in these sites you offer - thanks.
meteor
#12
Oct19-04, 05:40 PM
P: 915
LQG: The main difference that I see is that Nottale's approach indeed modifies General relativity, while Schleich and Witt are only giving a new definition of chaos, maintaining the habitual GR structure. For example, you must know that in GR spacetime is a differentiable manifold. But looking this Nottale's paper
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307093
he says there that in his theory spacetime is a non-differentiable manifold
Gokul43201
#13
Oct19-04, 09:37 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,155
Quote Quote by Loren Booda
Phantomas,

What would be the pattern of motion if the magnet system were superconducting?
The same.

This is a classical system, no matter whether the magnets are permanent magnet bars or superconducting electromagnets.

Why do you ask ?
Loren Booda
#14
Oct19-04, 09:59 PM
Loren Booda's Avatar
P: 3,408
It reminded me of a superconducting magnet that has the ability to be stably suspended without supports where a classical magnet cannot.
Gokul43201
#15
Oct19-04, 10:08 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,155
Loren, you are a recollecting incorrectly (boy, is that a tongue-twister !). What you are talking about, is a superconductor suspended over a regular magnet.

And remember that ferromagnetism itself is a Quantum Mechanical effect, so the only "classical magnet" is an electromagnet.

A superconducting magnet is merely an electromagnet that uses a superconducting wire for the current (so you can have much higher currents, and hence much higher field strengths).
Phantomas
#16
Oct19-04, 11:57 PM
P: 11
Exactly.
It doesn't matter what kind of magnets you use.
If they are stronger you have to use a heavier ball to get the same results, or just hang it higher.

P.
Loren Booda
#17
Oct20-04, 11:49 AM
Loren Booda's Avatar
P: 3,408
Gokul43201,

What is an example of a magnetically, otherwise freely suspended object at room temperature?
Gokul43201
#18
Oct21-04, 06:14 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,155
I can describe something that'll do this :

Take a strong (like an NdFeB or SmCo5) magnet in the shape of say a cylindrical disc of diameter D, magnetized along the direction of the axis. Set this on your table. Now over this slide a transparent (so it's nicer to see) plastic tube/pipe of inner diameter just barely greater than D, but have it be longer than the height (or thickness) or the magnet. Now take another magnet, identical to the first and drop it down the pipe. If you dropped it with opposite poles facing each other, this second magnet will levitate above the fist one.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Trends in physics, esp. new fundamental-a calm place to discuss trends Social Sciences 5
Calm under intense pressure General Discussion 3
Always a calm after the storm I guess.... Current Events 0
Is it true that 'during' a nuclear reaction such as in our sun General Physics 1
Peter Lynds, Calm after the Storm General Physics 0