New Reply

Moment Generating Function (proof of definition)

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Mar24-11, 06:45 AM   #1
 

Moment Generating Function (proof of definition)


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Prove that for a random variable [tex]X[/tex] with continuous probability distribution function [tex]f_X(x)[/tex] that the Moment Generating Function, defined as

[tex]
M_X(t) := E[e^{tX}]
[/tex]

is

[tex]
M_X(t) = \int_x^{\infty}e^{tx}f_X(x)dx
[/tex]

2. Relevant equations

Above and

[tex]
E[X] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}xf_X(x)dx
[/tex]

3. The attempt at a solution

This expression is given in so many textbooks and the ones that I have read all skip over this derivation. I want to be able to prove (1) to myself.

Proof:
Write the exponential function as a Maclaurin series:

[tex]
M_X(t) = E[e^{tX}]
[/tex]

[tex]
= E[1+tX+\frac{t^2}{2!}X^2+\frac{t^3}{3!}X^3+...]
[/tex]

Since [tex]E[1] = 1[/tex] and the [tex]E[t^n/n!]=t^n/n![/tex] because they are constant and the expectation of a constant is itself you get:

[tex]
= 1+tE[X]+\frac{t^2}{2!}E[X^2]+\frac{t^3}{3!}E[X^3]+...
[/tex]


...also using the linearity of E. Now, writing the series as a sum:

[tex]
=\sum_{t=0}^{\infty}\frac{t^n}{n!}E[X^n]
[/tex]

And extracting the exponential:

[tex]
=e^t\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}E[X^n]
[/tex]

Now I am stuck! I know that I am meant to use

[tex]
E[X] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}xf_X(x)dx
[/tex]

but I have [tex]E[X^n][/tex] and I also have [tex]e^t[/tex] and not [tex]e^{tx}[/tex].
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> 'Whodunnit' of Irish potato famine solved
>> The mammoth's lament: Study shows how cosmic impact sparked devastating climate change
>> Curiosity Mars rover drills second rock target
Mar24-11, 07:02 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
There isn't really much to prove. For any continuous probability distribution with density function f(x), the Expected value of any function u(x) is defined to be
[tex]E(u(x))= \int_{-\infty}^\infty u(x)f(x)dx[/itex]

Replace [itex]u(x)[/itex] with [itex]e^{tx}[/itex] and you have it. It is true that the whole point of the "moment generating function" is that the coefficients of the powers of x in a power series expansion are the "moments" of the probability distribution, but that doesn't seem to me to be relevant to this question. I see no reason to write its Taylor series.
 
Mar24-11, 07:17 AM   #3
 
Good, okay that makes sense.

Then I suppose all I had to do was prove

[tex]
E(u(x))= \int_{-\infty}^\infty u(x)f(x)dx
[/tex]

and then substitute [tex]u(x)[/tex] with [tex]e^{tx}[/tex] as you said and I'm done.

But once again there is nothing to prove because it is a definition.
 
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Moment Generating Function (proof of definition)
Thread Forum Replies
Finding the Probability distribution function given Moment Generating Function Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
Definition of moment generating function General Math 2
moment generating function help? Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 1
Moment Generating Function Calculus & Beyond Homework 11
Moment generating function Calculus & Beyond Homework 4