Solve the simultaneous equations

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter footprints
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simultaneous equations
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving simultaneous equations involving logarithmic expressions. Participants explore different interpretations of logarithmic notation and methods for manipulating logarithmic equations. The scope includes both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the simultaneous equations involving logarithms and seeks guidance on how to start solving them.
  • Another participant suggests rewriting the first equation in exponential form, indicating a potential starting point.
  • There is uncertainty regarding the meaning of "lg," with some participants proposing it refers to log base 10, while others suggest it could mean log base 2.
  • A participant asserts that "lg" is commonly understood as log base 10 in certain contexts, such as fluid mechanics.
  • One participant claims to have found a solution for the original equations, stating specific values for x and y.
  • Another participant agrees with the interpretation of "lg" as log base 10 and rewrites the second equation accordingly.
  • A new problem involving logarithms is introduced, with participants discussing how to manipulate the logarithmic expressions to solve it.
  • There is a disagreement regarding the correct approach to exponentiating the equation, with one participant asserting that the left-hand side is already in logarithmic form.
  • Another participant provides a detailed manipulation of the logarithmic equation, leading to a simplified form.
  • Participants discuss variations in logarithmic notation across different countries, highlighting differences in terminology.
  • One participant attempts to solve the new logarithmic equation but makes an error in the expression, which is pointed out by another participant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of "lg" and its implications for solving the equations. There is no consensus on the correct approach to the new logarithmic problem, with multiple methods being proposed and debated.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity in logarithmic notation and its dependence on context, which may affect the interpretation of the equations. The discussion includes unresolved steps in the mathematical manipulations presented.

footprints
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Sovle the simultaneous equations
[tex]log_2 (x-14y) = 3[/tex]
[tex]lgx - lg(y+1) = 1[/tex]
How do i start?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
for the first equation, make it

[tex]2^3= x-14y[/tex]

then carry on from there...

:smile:
 
Of course, without knowing what "lg" means we can't help you with the second equation!
 
I suppose lg means [tex]log_{10} ?[/tex] I got the question from my book.
 
Last edited:
Weird. I'm most familiar with lg denoting log base two, from my computer science courses.
 
Well u might be correct considering that u are probably smarter than me. But i was thaught that lg is [tex]log_{10}[/tex] if the base isn't stated.
 
lg is used, for example in certain fluid mechanics formulae, as the Briggsian logarithm, that is, [tex]log_{10}[/tex]
 
The answer for the question is x=15, y=1/2
 
Since you've learned to use "lg" as log10, stick with that!
The second equation can then be rewritten as:
[tex]\frac{x}{y+1}=10[/tex]
Do you agree with that reasoning?
 
  • #10
Yes. Thank you
 
  • #11
How about this one. Solve 1 + 2 lg (x+1) = lg (2x+1) + lg (5x+8)
Sorry but i still haven't got the hang of log yet
 
  • #12
Look first at your RIGHT-HAND side:
Can you write the sum of two logs as a single log?
 
  • #13
ok so i got [tex]lg(10x^2 + 21x + 8)[/tex]
Then i will get [tex]10+(x+1)^2 = (10x^2 + 21x + 8)[/tex]right?
 
  • #14
Right, so you can use that expression as your right-hand side instead (agreed?).
Now, consider the 2lg(x+1)-term on your original left-hand side.
Can you rewrite that into log(something..)
 
  • #15
No, your suggestion at exponentiating the equation is wrong, even though you made a correct rewriting of your right-hand side
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Isn't the left hand side in a log form already? Except the 1.
 
  • #17
It is completely wrong:
We have:
[tex]1+lg((x+1)^{2})=lg(...)[/tex]
We must move the log term on the left-hand side over and get:
[tex]1=lg(\frac{(...)}{(x+1)^{2}})[/tex]
Or :
[tex]10=\frac{(...)}{(x+1)^{2}}[/tex]

Do you see the difference?

I've used (...) to denote what stood on the right-hand side.
 
  • #18
Ahhh... Finally i get it. I can solve it from here.
 
Last edited:
  • #19
What notation you use for logarythms in base "e" and in base "10"? In Spain we use "ln" for the first, and "log" for second. I think that your notation is not the same...
 
  • #20
Same for me in my country
 
  • #21
I would do 1 + 2 lg (x+1) = lg (2x+1) + lg (5x+8)
by rewriting it as lg(2x+1)+ lg(5x+8)- 2log(x+1)= 1 so
lg((2x+1)(5x+1)/(x+1)2)= 1 which is the same as

[tex]\frac{(2x+1)(5x+1)/(x+1)^2}= 10[/tex]
or
[tex](2x+1)(5x+1)= 10(x+1)^2[/tex]
which is
[tex]10x^2+7x+ 1= 10x<sup>2</sup>+ 20x+ 10[/tex]
so
[tex]-13x= 9[/tex]
 
  • #22
Halls: It is (5x+8) rather than (5x+1)..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K