Register to reply

Convolutions of Lebesgue integrable functions

by redbowlover
Tags: convolutions, functions, integrable, lebesgue
Share this thread:
May4-11, 10:21 PM
P: 16

Looking through Torchinksy's Real Variables text and I'm infinitely confused about convolutions.

For two integrable functions [tex] f, g \in \ L^1(R) [/tex] we define the convolution [tex] f*g=\int_R f(x-y)g(y) dy , \forall x\in R [/tex].

Then, apparently, [tex]f*g[/tex] is also integrable. But I'm not sure how to prove this. The text says, for now suppose f, g and the integrand are nonnegative. Then [tex]||f*g||_1=\int_R\int_R f(x-y)g(y) dydx[/tex].

But why is this true? Clearly [tex]||f*g||_1=\int_R\int_R f(x-y)g(y) dydm[/tex], where m is the Lebesgue measure. But what allows you to switch to dx? Maybe this speaks to my greater misunderstanding of integrals. Sigh...If anyone could explain this to me I'd be very grateful.

I thought in general you could only switch from Lebesgue integration to Riemann integration when you knew the thing was Riemann integrable.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Sapphire talk enlivens guesswork over iPhone 6
Geneticists offer clues to better rice, tomato crops
UConn makes 3-D copies of antique instrument parts
May5-11, 02:02 PM
P: 607
He writes $\int_R f(x) dx$ to mean the Lebesgue integral.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Example of Lebesgue Integral but not Riemann Integrable Calculus 7
What is the reason that 1/x is not lebesgue integrable? Calculus 12
Question about Lebesgue integrable functions Calculus 0
Can anyone come up with a Lebesgue-integrable function that... Calculus 8
Lebesgue Integrable Function question Calculus & Beyond Homework 1