How Long Will It Take for the Top Block to Slide Off the Bottom Block?

  • Thread starter Thread starter caseys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks Sliding
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving two blocks: a one-foot cubic block on top of a four-foot cubic block, both initially moving at 36 fps. The bottom block decelerates at -28.98 fps/s² due to a coefficient of friction (cof) of 0.9, while the top block decelerates at -9.66 fps/s² with a cof of 0.3. By applying the equation d = v0t + 1/2at², it is determined that the top block will take 0.268 seconds to travel 4 feet and fall off the bottom block.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly motion and friction.
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations, specifically d = v0t + 1/2at².
  • Knowledge of coefficients of friction and their impact on deceleration.
  • Ability to solve quadratic equations for time and distance calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced kinematics to understand motion under varying acceleration.
  • Learn about frictional forces and their calculations in different materials.
  • Explore real-world applications of physics problems involving sliding objects.
  • Practice solving similar physics problems to enhance critical thinking skills.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion and friction in practical scenarios.

caseys
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Two blocks, a one foot cubic block in sitting on top a four foot cubic block. Both blocks are moving forward at 36 fps and instantly begin to decelerate...the larger block with cof of .9 (-28.98 fps/sqr) and the top block with cof of .3 (-9.66 fps/sqr).

Trying to determine the time/distance the bottom block will travel to when the top block travels the four feet and falls off the bottom block.

Whew! Appreciate the homework help with this one...the kid is getting too smart for me.

Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to combine both of the declerations, and then use the x=1/2at(sqr).
 
, it looks like you have a challenging problem on your hands! The sliding blocks problem is a classic physics problem that requires a lot of critical thinking and mathematical skills. Let's break it down step by step to see if we can come up with a solution together.

First, we need to understand the initial conditions of the problem. We have two blocks, a one foot cubic block sitting on top of a four foot cubic block. Both blocks are moving forward at a constant speed of 36 fps. This means that the bottom block is traveling at 36 fps and the top block is also traveling at 36 fps, but with an additional 36 fps on top of that due to the movement of the bottom block.

Next, we need to take into account the deceleration of both blocks. The larger block has a coefficient of friction (cof) of 0.9, which means it will decelerate at a rate of -28.98 fps/sqr. The top block has a cof of 0.3, which means it will decelerate at a rate of -9.66 fps/sqr. This means that both blocks will be slowing down as they move forward.

Now, we need to figure out the time and distance that the top block will travel before it falls off the bottom block. To do this, we can use the equation d = v0t + 1/2at^2, where d is the distance, v0 is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, and t is the time.

For the top block, we know that the initial velocity (v0) is 36 fps and the acceleration (a) is -9.66 fps/sqr. We also know that the distance (d) is 4 feet. Plugging these values into the equation, we get:

4 = 36t + 1/2(-9.66)t^2

Solving for t, we get t = 0.268 seconds. This means that it will take the top block 0.268 seconds to travel 4 feet and fall off the bottom block.

Now, we can use this time to figure out the distance that the bottom block will travel during this time. Since both blocks are moving at the same speed, we can use the equation d = vt, where d is the distance, v is the velocity, and t is the time.

For the bottom block, we know that the velocity
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
17K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K