US Army at a Breaking Point: FRONTLINE & The Washington Post Investigate

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Army Point
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the current state of the United States Army, particularly in light of its deployments and operational challenges. It examines the implications of military strategies, specifically contrasting the Rumsfeld Doctrine with the Powell Doctrine, and explores the broader context of military readiness and public support for military actions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern that the U.S. Army is overstretched and demoralized, potentially unable to meet national military objectives.
  • Others discuss the Rumsfeld Doctrine, highlighting its aggressive approach to military control and strategy under Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
  • A contrasting viewpoint is presented regarding the Powell Doctrine, which advocates for military action as a last resort, emphasizing overwhelming force, public support, and a clear exit strategy.
  • One participant references historical context, noting that the Powell Doctrine was influenced by experiences from the Vietnam War and earlier military strategies.
  • Participants share links to videos and resources related to the discussion, including a video featuring Donald Rumsfeld.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on military strategy, with some supporting the principles of the Powell Doctrine while others advocate for the Rumsfeld Doctrine. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which approach is more effective or appropriate given the current military context.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of the doctrines and the specific conditions under which military actions are deemed necessary or justified. The implications of public support and military readiness are also not fully explored.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
With the United States Army deployed in a dozen hot spots around the world, on constant alert in Afghanistan, and taking casualties every day in Iraq, some current and former officers now say the army is on the verge of being "broken." They charge that the army is overstretched, demoralized, and may be unable to fight where and when the nation desires.

This fall, FRONTLINE and The Washington Post join forces for an in-depth assessment of the state of the American army and the nation's military establishment. The program digs into the aggressive attempts to assert civilian control and remake the military by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his allies
Times showing, transcripts, online video
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In reasonable contrast to the Rumsfeld Doctrine is the Powell Doctrine (informal) :

After the end of Persian Gulf War in 1991, Colin Powell, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, outlined his vision for efficient and decisive military action. His plan is now referred to as the Powell Doctrine, although there is not an actual formal document named as such. Powell, currently the U.S. secretary of state, has recently invoked the Doctrine in articulating the justifications for the Bush administration's preparations for war in Iraq. Essentially, the Doctrine expresses that military action should be used only as a last resort and only if there is a clear risk to national security by the intended target; the force, when used, should be overwhelming and disproportionate to the force used by the enemy; there must be strong support for the campaign by the general public; and there must be a clear exit strategy from the conflict in which the military is engaged.

Powell based this strategy for warfare in part on the views held by his former boss in the Reagan administration, Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger, and also on his own experience as a major in Vietnam. That protracted campaign, in Powell's view, was representative of a war in which public support was flimsy, the military objectives were not clear, overwhelming force was not used consistently, and an exit strategy was ill defined.
 
This is on again at tonight and the video can be watched online.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K