Why is the slope of the Fa graph not equal to m in this Atwood machine setup?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guru3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    F=ma
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The slope of the force-acceleration (Fa) graph in an Atwood machine setup is equal to the mass on one side of the pulley (m1), not the total mass (m). In this experiment, the total mass is kept constant while varying m1, leading to the observed slope being half of the expected value. The relationship is defined by the equation F = m1 * a, where F is the force applied, m1 is the mass on one side, and a is the acceleration. Therefore, the slope of the graph represents m1, clarifying the confusion regarding the expected slope value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion (F=ma)
  • Familiarity with Atwood machine setups in physics
  • Basic graphing skills for plotting force vs. acceleration
  • Knowledge of calculating slope from a graph
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Atwood machine equations
  • Learn how to calculate slope from a graph using two points
  • Explore variations of the Atwood machine and their implications on force and acceleration
  • Investigate the effects of changing mass on the dynamics of the system
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of mechanics and the relationship between force and acceleration in experimental setups.

Guru3
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We've been given a lab in physics class to verify that F=ma graphically. To do this we had a cart with weights on top be pulled by a string with weights on the other end over a pully pull the cart down, bringing weights off the cart to the end of the string to keep the mass constant, but changing the force. Doing this with 7 different weights produced 7 sets which we graphed with F on the x-axis, and a on the y-axis. The problem is the slope of the Fa graph which I would have thought to be m, is aparently half m. Anyone have any idea why? This one is beating me over the head :(. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It should be m

what are your caculations (data) read?
 


First of all, it's great that you are conducting a lab to verify the relationship between force and acceleration. This is an important concept in physics and it's important to have hands-on experience to fully understand it.

Now, let's address the issue you are facing with the slope of the Fa graph. From your description, it seems like you are using a cart with weights on top being pulled by a string with weights on the other end over a pulley. This setup is known as an Atwood machine and it is commonly used to study the relationship between force and acceleration.

The equation for an Atwood machine is F = (m1 - m2) * a, where m1 is the mass on one side of the pulley, m2 is the mass on the other side, and a is the acceleration of the system. This equation is derived from the second law of motion, F=ma.

However, in your setup, you are keeping the total mass (m1 + m2) constant by transferring weights from the cart to the other end of the string. This means that the mass on one side of the pulley (m1) is changing while the mass on the other side (m2) remains constant. Therefore, the equation for your setup would be F = m1 * a.

Now, let's look at your graph. You have correctly plotted F on the x-axis and a on the y-axis. However, the slope of your graph is not m, it is actually m1. This is because the equation for your setup is F = m1 * a, so the slope of your graph represents the value of m1.

To verify this, you can calculate the slope of your graph by taking two points on the line and using the formula for slope (rise/run). The slope should be equal to the value of m1.

In conclusion, the reason why the slope of your Fa graph is not m is because the equation for your setup is F = m1 * a, where m1 is the changing mass on one side of the pulley. I hope this helps to clarify your confusion. Keep up the good work in your physics class!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
40K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K