How Do We Apply Boundary Conditions in the Euler-Lagrange Equation Derivation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter homology
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of boundary conditions in the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation, specifically for cases where the integrand is a function of x, y(x), and y'(x) defined on the interval [a,b]. Participants confirm that the functions considered must have continuous second derivatives and that the derivation involves incrementing y(x) by h(x), with h(x_0) and h(x_1) equal to zero. This indicates that a broader function space is utilized before applying boundary conditions to select the specific solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Familiarity with variational principles
  • Knowledge of function spaces, particularly those with continuous second derivatives
  • Basic concepts of boundary conditions in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation in detail
  • Explore variational methods and their applications in physics
  • Investigate the implications of boundary conditions in functional analysis
  • Learn about different function spaces and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers involved in optimization problems and those studying calculus of variations will benefit from this discussion.

homology
Messages
305
Reaction score
1
So when deriving the Euler-Lagrange equation for the simple case (the integrand is just a function of x, y(x), and y'(x) where y is defined on [a,b]) we're interested in those functions which connect two points (x_0, y(x_0)) and (x_1, y(x_1)). But these functions don't form a function space in themselves. So are we just looking at all functions on [a,b] with continuous second derivatives and out of those, considering the ones which satisfy the boundary conditions we're interested in?

This must be the case, because in the derivation we then increment y(x) by an h(x) where h(x_0)=h(x_1)=0. This wouldn't make sense unless we were considering a larger space than just those functions satisfying the boundary conditions. Just let me know if I'm on the right track here.

Thanks,

Kevin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The variation principle violates the boundary conditions. We first solve the problem in general, obtaining a set of solutions, and the use the boundary conditions to pick the specific solution we are looking for.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K