Permeability, permittivity and susceptibilityby luitzen Tags: permeability, permittivity, susceptibility 

#1
Jun2811, 06:39 AM

P: 50

I got a little confused of these three things by my teacher and Griffiths.
I am acquaintanced with Feynman's lectures on physics and what I get from there is [itex]\epsilon=\epsilon_{r}\epsilon_{0} = \left(1+\chi\right)\epsilon_{0}[/itex] For some reason Griffiths, as well as my teacher, likes to use [itex]\mu_{0}[/itex], where [itex]\mu_{0} = \dfrac{1}{\epsilon_{0}c^{2}}[/itex]. Now I'd assume [itex]\mu=\dfrac{1}{\epsilon c^{2}}[/itex] and thus [itex]\mu=\dfrac{1}{\epsilon_{r}\epsilon_{0}c^{2}} = \dfrac{1}{\epsilon_{r}}\mu_{0}=\left(1+\chi\right)^{1}\mu_{0}[/itex] But apparently (Wikipedia, Griffiths, etc.) [itex]\mu=\left(1+\chi\right)\mu_{0}[/itex] So what should it be? And why do they use [itex]\mu[/itex] at all? It seem rather inconvenient to me, since they keep writing stuff like [itex]\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{\epsilon_{0}\mu_{0}}}[/itex] instead of c. 



#2
Jun2811, 06:45 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,721

\mu and \epsilon are different things. Permittivity is related to the material response to an applied electric field. Permeability is related to the material response to a magnetic field. They do not share the same susceptibility and only in free space can you assume that the product of the two is equal to c^2.




#3
Jun2811, 07:44 AM

P: 50

Ok, thank you very much.
Then I think I'm gonna stick with [itex]\mu[/itex] for the test and find out what it exactly means later. 



#4
Jun2811, 10:52 AM

P: 58

Permeability, permittivity and susceptibility
Don't you find it beautiful that c is defined as the reciprocal of the square root of the product of two truly fundamental constants of nature?
That identity tells you what c is  it's the speed at which an electromagnetic wave can propagate through free space and it is governed only by the electrical permittivity and the magnetic permeability of free space. I find it jaw dropping. 



#5
Jun2811, 03:03 PM

P: 50

I always saw the speed of light as something that was just known and I thought that permeability was used because it showed up often with permittivity and physicists are lazy. Now I realize that permeability and permittivity are something entirely different. That doesn't mean I now understand what it means, but it's at least a start.
I just started reading a book "Space, time and relativity" by Engel Roza and now I also know that the speed of light was first determined, by Maxwell, using [itex]\mu_{0}[/itex] and [itex]\epsilon_{0}[/itex] PS does anyone know why my TeX isn't displayed correctly in my first post? I can't find a mistake, but maybe someone else can. PPS adding spaces did miracles. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Permittivity and Permeability of Free Space  Classical Physics  9  
Sign of permittivity/permeability  Classical Physics  12  
Relative permittivity/Permeability  General Physics  13  
permeability and permittivity question  Classical Physics  1  
permittivity permeability  General Physics  3 