Does f(x) = c Imply That f'(x) = 0?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter danne89
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between a constant function, f(x) = c, and its derivative, f'(x). Participants explore whether this implies that f'(x) = 0, examining the concept through various mathematical approaches, including algebraic reasoning and non-standard analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that if f(x) = c, then f'(x) must equal 0, citing the definition of the derivative as the limit of the difference quotient.
  • Others express confusion over the algebraic manipulation involved, questioning the assumptions made about Δx and Δy.
  • One participant mentions their preference for solving the problem using algebra rather than limits, referencing a book that introduces calculus concepts using infinitesimals.
  • There are discussions about the definition of infinitesimals and their role in understanding derivatives, with some participants noting that traditional calculus textbooks do not rigorously define them.
  • Some participants challenge the use of Δx = c, suggesting that it misrepresents the meaning of the change in variables.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of non-standard analysis, explaining how derivatives are defined differently in that context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of f(x) = c regarding f'(x). There are competing views on the algebraic approach versus the limit-based approach, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct interpretation of the derivative in this context.

Contextual Notes

Some participants have not yet learned limits, which affects their understanding of derivatives. The discussion also highlights the varying definitions and interpretations of infinitesimals in different mathematical frameworks.

danne89
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
f(x) = c => f'(x) = 0 ??

Hi again! Now I can't understand [itex]f(x) = c\Rightarrow f'(x) = 0[/itex], where c is a constant. I think I should be undefined.
y = c
[itex]\Delta x[/itex]= c
[tex]\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta x} = \frac{c}{\Delta x}[/tex]
[tex]st(\frac{c}{\Delta x}) = Undefined[/tex]
What am I doing wrong this time?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
y=c, but [tex]\bigtriangleup{y}=c-c=0[/tex]
 
If f(x)=c for all x, then

[tex]f'(x)=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(h)}{h}=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{c-c}{h}=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}0=0[/tex]
 
arildno said:
y=c, but [tex]\bigtriangleup{y}=c-c=0[/tex]
Arghhh! :mad: That demostrates the importance of written every stage out.

y = c
y + [itex]\Delta y[/itex] = c + c
[itex]\Delta y[/itex] = c - c = 0
[tex]\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta x} = \frac{0}{\Delta x} = 0[/tex]
Thus f'(x) = 0

Sorry, Fredrik. Haven't learned limits yet. Thanks for trying to explain.

Thanks!
 
Haven't learned limits yet?

Then what are you doing with the derivative? That's a lot like working with fractions before you have learned to multiply!

(Do you know the "slope" of a straight line? What's the slope of a horizontal straight line?)
 
I think he said in another thread that he was reading about non-standard analysis.
 
Sure I know that a constant function has zero slope, but I want to solve it the algebra-way.

The book I'm reading is "Elementary Calculus: An Approach Using Infinitesimals", which, as the titel states, uses infinitesimals to introduce both derivatives and integrals - before limits.
 
Hmm. When I think about it: [itex]\Delta y + y[/itex] can't be c + c. Then
[tex]\Delta y = c + c - c = c[/tex]
Argh!
 
again, [itex]y+\Delta y=c[/itex], [itex]\Delta y =0[/itex]

You have to be more carefull with algebra if you don't want to go insane (trust me)!
 
  • #10
danne89 said:
Sure I know that a constant function has zero slope, but I want to solve it the algebra-way.

The book I'm reading is "Elementary Calculus: An Approach Using Infinitesimals", which, as the titel states, uses infinitesimals to introduce both derivatives and integrals - before limits.

And how do they actually DEFINE "infinitesmal"?
 
  • #11
danne89 said:
Sorry, Fredrik. Haven't learned limits yet. Thanks for trying to explain.

It's a lot easier to understand derivatives if you know limits. I suggest you hit that before trying to understand the derivative of a constant.
 
  • #12
HallsofIvy said:
And how do they actually DEFINE "infinitesmal"?
As an infinite small number (short: infinitesimal).
 
  • #13
Why should [itex]\Delta x = c[/itex]??

I think you've totally forgotten what [itex]\Delta[/itex] usually means:

[tex](\Delta p)(q) = p(q + v) - p(q)[/tex]

For some nonzero v. (For your purposes, v should be a nonzero infinitessimal)
(And yes, I know I used unusual variable names. :-p)
 
  • #14
I believe I've seen the text danne is using, it's not bad. It doesn't rigorously define infinitessimals, but normal calc textbooks don't rigorously define the real numbers either. :-p

In nonstandard analysis, the derivative of a standard function f is defined by:

[tex] f'(x) = \mathrm{Std} \frac{f^*(x^*+h) - f^*(x^*)}{h}[/tex]

whenever the right hand side is independent of your choice of nonzero infinitessimal h. "Std" means "round to the nearest real number", and the * denotes the nonstandard version of that symbol.

Note that the notion of limit, here, has been replaced with the notion of nearest standard number.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Hurkyl said:
Why should [itex]\Delta x = c[/itex]??

I think you've totally forgotten what [itex]\Delta[/itex] usually means:

[tex](\Delta p)(q) = p(q + v) - p(q)[/tex]

For some nonzero v. (For your purposes, v should be a nonzero infinitessimal)
(And yes, I know I used unusual variable names. :-p)
Hmm. Isn't it [itex](\Delta p)(q) = p(q) + p(v) - p(q)[/itex].
[tex]y = f(x)[/tex]
[tex]y + \Delta y = f(x) + f(\Delta x)[/tex]
[tex]\Delta y = f(x) + f(\Delta x) - f(x) = f(\Delta x)[/tex]
And then, because f(x) = c
[tex]\Delta y = c + c - c = c[/tex]

I think you denote your std() with st() and it's called the "Standard Part" of the hyperreal (reals + infinitesimals) number.
 
  • #16
hmmm ...isn't it (Delta p)(q) = q(p+v) - q(p) .
 
  • #17
Oops. My mistake. I should have checked that up before bother you. :(
 
  • #18
I think you're thinking of the more explicit notation:

[tex] (\Delta_v p)(q) = p(q + v) - p(q)[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K