| New Reply |
question about two sample t-test (unpaired) |
Share Thread |
| Jul21-11, 11:34 PM | #1 |
|
|
question about two sample t-test (unpaired)
I have read that the statistic computed for the unpaired two sample t-test is:
[itex]t = \frac{\bar{x} - \bar{y}}{\sqrt{SEM_x + SEM_y}}[/itex] where: [itex]SEM_x = \frac{\sigma^2_x}{n_x}[/itex] (and likewise for y). Part of this makes sense: it is satisfactorily proven to me that that [itex]Var(\bar{x} - \bar{y}) = Var(\bar{x}) + Var(\bar{y})[/itex] when the two variables are independent. Then the denominator is the standard deviation of the term [itex]\bar{x} - \bar{y})[/itex]. What doesn't make sense is that the numerator isn't normalized. In the one sample t-test, one computes: [itex]t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_x}{\sqrt{SEM_x}}[/itex] so, here, [itex]\bar{x}[/itex] is normalized with [itex]\mu_x[/itex]. I don't see why this shouldn't also apply to the two-sample case. Can someone enlighten me? |
| Jul22-11, 02:01 AM | #2 |
|
|
In the two-sample t-test, you're testing whether the two samples are different from each other; that is, whether the mean of the difference between them is zero. You can think of the numerator as having an implicit 0 subtracted from it, if you like.
|
| Jul22-11, 02:05 AM | #3 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: question about two sample t-test (unpaired)
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| large sample test | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 6 | ||
| Mathematical Statistics- two sample t-test | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 4 | ||
| Why use mann-whitney U test rather than independent sample test? | Other Science Learning Materials | 0 | ||
| Why use mann-whitney U test rather than independent sample test? | Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework | 0 | ||