| New Reply |
electromagnetic fields and empty space |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jul25-11, 10:36 AM | #1 |
|
|
electromagnetic fields and empty space
is it possible for electromagnetic field to exist without matter?
|
| PhysOrg.com |
physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Promising doped zirconia >> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease >> Bringing life into focus |
| Jul25-11, 12:06 PM | #2 |
|
|
Yes, it is.
That's one of the particulars of 20th century physics. People have thought for a long time that electromagnetic fields should propagate through some medium, in the same way that water waves or sound do. To explain EM waves propagating through vacuum they invented the concept of something called ether, permeating throughout space. Ironically the experiment of Michaelson and Morley, which intended to prove the existence of that substance, was one of the major factors in discarding it. |
| Jul25-11, 01:47 PM | #3 |
|
|
Yep! Just look at a photon!
|
| Jul25-11, 02:16 PM | #4 |
|
|
electromagnetic fields and empty space
Doesn't the EM field require the existence of charged particles to form?
|
| Jul25-11, 02:31 PM | #5 |
|
|
light isn't a charged particle but it is an oscillating ripple in the EM field. But I couldn't tell you why.
|
| Jul25-11, 03:57 PM | #6 |
|
|
I think what OP wants to know is that electromagnetic wave can propagate without a medium, but can you create them without charged matter somewhere. Yes, You need some oscillating charge somewhere to create them, except maybe for fluctuation of the vacuum.
On the other hand, one predicted death of the universe is that everything, including proton, decays to photons so far away from each other that they never interact. So I suppose that'd be the case of photon without matter. |
| Jul25-11, 05:42 PM | #7 |
|
|
|
| Jul25-11, 06:00 PM | #8 |
|
Mentor
|
In principle it would be possible to have a universe with no charges, but with radiation. The early universe was radiation-dominated.
Edit: looks like Drakkith beat me to it! |
| Jul25-11, 06:21 PM | #9 |
|
|
Respectfully, Steve |
| Jul25-11, 08:14 PM | #10 |
|
Mentor
|
|
| Jul26-11, 05:48 AM | #11 |
|
|
|
| Jul26-11, 06:03 AM | #12 |
|
|
|
| Jul26-11, 06:13 AM | #13 |
|
|
|
| Jul26-11, 06:26 AM | #14 |
|
|
|
| Jul26-11, 06:59 AM | #15 |
|
|
Radiation dominant doesn't mean there wasn't matter, simply that the matter/antimatter difference was so slight that when they combined, most of the matter was converted to radiation, leaving a small amount of matter, and a relatively large amount of radiation (dominant == considerably higher energy density). I don't believe radiation dominant can be used for an argument that the electromagnetic field can exist without there ever previously being any charge present. That radiation came from charge/anticharge interactions in the first place. |
| Jul26-11, 09:49 AM | #16 |
|
|
|
| Jul26-11, 10:17 AM | #17 |
|
|
I see electrons, protons and other subatomic particles coming together from the regime of ionizing radiation to form atoms and molecules. Respectfully submitted, Steve |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: electromagnetic fields and empty space
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Feynman's empty space isn't really empty space | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 12 | ||
| empty space | Special & General Relativity | 5 | ||
| Empty space is something? | Special & General Relativity | 24 | ||
| Empty space ? | Special & General Relativity | 5 | ||