Time of a toy car travelling over a surface

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter COBRA1185
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Surface Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the time it takes for toy cars to travel down inclines of varying angles (10, 20, 30, and 40 degrees) and subsequently stop on different surfaces. Participants explore the relationship between incline angle, distance traveled, and stopping time, as well as the coefficient of friction of the surfaces involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the stopping times of the toy cars should increase or decrease with the distance traveled from different levels of incline.
  • Another suggests using a quadratic equation to calculate time differences, indicating a mathematical approach may be beneficial.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of keeping the top of the inclines at the same height to maintain consistent potential energy across trials.
  • Concerns are raised about the transition from the incline to the flat surface, particularly regarding energy loss during the impact if the transition is not smooth.
  • One participant posits that theoretically, all inclines should yield the same stopping time results.
  • Questions arise about the nature of the transition to the flat surface and whether it is made of the same material as the incline.
  • A later reply indicates that a miscalculation was identified, and the results are now consistent, suggesting some resolution to earlier confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between incline angle, distance, and stopping time, with no clear consensus reached on whether stopping times should increase or decrease. Some participants propose theoretical expectations, while others raise practical considerations that complicate the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential assumptions about the smoothness of the transition between surfaces and the uniformity of materials used for inclines and flat surfaces. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the impact of these factors on the results.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring dynamics, friction, and experimental physics, particularly in educational or hobbyist contexts involving toy vehicles and inclines.

COBRA1185
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I have been sending toy cars down inclines of 10, 20, 30 and 40 degrees and I have been trying to work out the times that they should take and am wondering if the times that they take to stop on a surface take should increase or decrease with the distance traveled from the different levels of incline

Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should probably use a quadratic equation to calculate the time differences. Is there any mathematicians here? I would also like to know. :)
 
Last edited:
are you keeping the top extreme of your inclines at the same height? that way you are starting with the same potential energy in all cases; otherwise...

also, how is the transition from the incline to the flat surface? is it smooth? otherwise, the greater the incline, the more energy you will waste in the impact at the bottom during the transition.
 
Yes the inclines are at the same height and the transition is fairly smooth onto the different surfaces (concrete carpet)

The main thing is that we are trying to find is the coefficient of friction of that surface. But we were just wondering does the time the car takes to stop increase with the incline or decrease. by the way the distance increases as the incline increases??
 
I think, theoretically speaking, they should all yield the same result
 
Do you mean the toy car rolls down an incline and then it suddenly hits a flat surface, or is the transition smooth? is the flat surface the same material as the incline?
 
Dont worry guys, it was a miscalculation of the results, everything works now, thanks for all your input
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K