Solving Velocity Problem: Mass, Frequency, Amlitude, & Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter compute_a_nerd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass-spring system where a 0.5 kg mass vibrates at a frequency of 3 Hz with an amplitude of 0.15 m. The original poster is trying to determine the velocity of the mass as it passes through the equilibrium point, questioning the role of energy and frequency in the calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy in the system, with references to relevant equations. There are attempts to relate the frequency to the spring constant and the energy equations. Some participants explore the mathematical representation of motion through sine functions and derivatives to find velocity.

Discussion Status

Multiple approaches to the problem are being explored, with some participants suggesting different methods to calculate velocity. There is acknowledgment of potential mistakes in calculations, and some participants express confusion about the relationships between the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the energy conservation in the system and the implications of maximum velocity at the equilibrium position. There is a mention of potential algebraic errors and the need for careful calculation.

compute_a_nerd
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Ok this problem does have me stumped. This is the area in the chapter I am a little sketchy on. So here is the prob.

A .5kg mass at the end of a spring vibrates at 3hz, with an amplitude of .15m. What is the velocity when it passes through the equalibrium point.

So I figured that this is an energy situation where E=1/2mv^2. But do I know the energy? Also where does the frequency come in?
Thanks again
Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to consider the energy think of it this way:

In this (lossless) system, potential energy is being converted into kinetic energy and back again in such a way that the total energy is constant. You can calculate the kinetic energy like you said: K = .5mv2

The potential energy is given by U = .5kx2, where x is the displacement from the equilibrium position.

You should have seen somewhere that the natural frequency of the system is given by [tex]\omega^2 = \frac k m[/tex], so that you can find k from given quantities.

Consider 2 locations of the mass:

1st at the equilibrium position, the potential energy is zero. This makes intuitive sense since the spring is not compressed or extended and follows from the equation we just saw. At this position, your equation holds true: E = .5mv2, where v is what we're trying to find.

The 2nd position we should consider is where the mass is at the edge of its travel: x = A = .15 m. At this point, what is the kinetic energy of the mass (hint: the mass stops at this point as it changes direction). Now you can calculate E again.

Set your two expressions for E equal to each other and solve for v.

(The other way to do it is if you know the equation for SHM position as a function of time --> velocity as a function of time.)
 
you could set this up something like this:

x(t) = A sin(wt)

where w = 2*pi*f and A is the Amplitude.

velocity is given by dx/dt

Now, you know that at the equilibrium point, the velocity will be a maximum, so there's a few ways to go about doing it from here.

I would find what values of t give x=0. (remember that sin(m*Pi) = 0 , m=0,1,2...etc)

And then substitute into the velocity equation.
 
Last edited:
jamesrc I think I tried what you were saying and I still got the wrong answer.
I did [tex]1/2 m v ^2 = 1/2 k x^2[/tex] to find k I used [tex]f = 1/2 \pi \sqrt k/m[/tex] Then x is eqal to A when all the energy is potential. I just don't see what I did wrong?

k=177.65, x=.15, and I find v to be equal to 7.30034
thanks
 
V=2*pi*f*A, where f-frequency, so v=3m/s
Isn't it correct?
 
With the way I would do it, I got v=2.8 m/s, which with sig figs v=3 m/s

same as Yegor
 
compute_a_nerd: Either way you do it, you should find that [tex]v = A \omega[/tex], so you may just want to check your algebra; (without skipping too many steps):

[tex]\frac{mv^2}2 = \frac{kx^2}2[/tex]
[tex]v = \sqrt{\frac{kx^2}m}[/tex]
[tex]v = A\sqrt{\frac k m }[/tex]
[tex]v = A\omega[/tex]

which is the same numerically as what the other guys here were saying.
 
Thanks guys your right, just a plug and chug mistake. I must have been out of it last night, cause I just couldn't get it to work. lol.
thanks a lot
Chris
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
7K