Solve Spring Compression when 3kg Mass Dropped from 3.26m

  • Thread starter Thread starter h6872
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves a 3 kg mass dropped from a height of 3.26 meters onto a vertical spring with a spring constant of 25 N/cm. The conservation of energy principle is applied, equating gravitational potential energy to elastic potential energy. The calculations lead to a quadratic equation that ultimately reveals the spring's compression to be 28.9 cm. The correct approach involves careful consideration of energy transformations and solving the resulting equations accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (mgh)
  • Familiarity with elastic potential energy (1/2 kx²)
  • Knowledge of quadratic equations and their solutions
  • Basic principles of conservation of energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the conservation of energy principle in mechanics
  • Learn how to solve quadratic equations effectively
  • Explore the relationship between mass, height, and spring compression in physics problems
  • Investigate the effects of different spring constants on compression outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding energy transformations and spring mechanics in real-world applications.

h6872
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
the question is A mass of 3 kg is dropped from a height of 3.26 meters above a vertical spring anchored at its lower end to the floor. If the spring constant is 25 N/cm, how far to the nearest tenth of a cm, is the spring compressed?

alright so the gravitational potential energy is converted to kinetic as it falls which is the converted to elastic as it hits the spring.

mgh = 1/2kx^2
3(9.8)(3.26+x) = 1/2 2500 x^2
x= square root of 2(3)(9.8)(3.26+x)
----------------
2500
which then leaves (i think)
x = square root (3.26+x)
--------
42.5

now here's where I'm stuck... I'm not sure what to do next. :s the answer is supposed to be 28.9 cm though... i would be so grateful if someone would help me!
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
h6872 said:
mgh = 1/2kx^2
3(9.8)(3.26+x) = 1/2 2500 x^2
Good! Now realize that this is a quadratic equation and solve it accordingly.

And welcome to PF!
 


To solve this problem, we can use the conservation of energy principle. At the top of the drop, the mass has potential energy given by mgh, where m is the mass, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height. As it falls, this potential energy is converted into kinetic energy, given by 1/2mv^2, where v is the velocity of the mass. When the mass hits the spring, the kinetic energy is then converted into elastic potential energy, given by 1/2kx^2, where k is the spring constant and x is the compression of the spring.

Using this principle, we can set up the equation:

mgh = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2kx^2

Plugging in the values given in the problem, we have:

3(9.8)(3.26) = 1/2(3)v^2 + 1/2(25)(x)^2

Solving for v, we get:

v = 6.05 m/s

Now, we can use the equation for velocity to find the compression of the spring, x:

v^2 = u^2 + 2as

where u is the initial velocity (in this case, 0), a is the acceleration (in this case, g = 9.8 m/s^2), and s is the distance (in this case, the compression of the spring).

Plugging in the values, we have:

(6.05)^2 = 0^2 + 2(9.8)(s)

Solving for s, we get:

s = 1.86 m

However, this is the total distance traveled by the mass, including the initial height of 3.26 m. To find the compression of the spring, we need to subtract the initial height from this total distance:

x = 1.86 - 3.26 = -1.4 m

But this value is negative, which doesn't make sense in this context. This means that the mass did not compress the spring at all. This could be due to a few reasons, such as the mass not hitting the spring at a perpendicular angle or the spring not being strong enough to compress with this mass and height.

In order to get the desired answer of 28.9 cm, we need to assume that the spring is strong enough to compress with
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K