Bush Signs Executive Order on Secrecy

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around President George W. Bush's signing of an executive order related to the classification and declassification of national security information, specifically focusing on the implications of this order for transparency and historical accountability. The scope includes political analysis, historical context, and media implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the timing and nature of the executive order indicate an intention to limit public access to documents from previous administrations, particularly regarding sensitive topics like relationships with Islamic terrorists.
  • Others argue that the order resembles tactics used in past administrations to obscure information, drawing parallels to Nixon-era cover-ups.
  • A participant expresses hope that the media will respond to the executive order by investigating and exposing perceived dishonesty in the Bush administration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a general skepticism towards the motives behind the executive order, with multiple competing views on its implications for transparency and accountability. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the potential consequences of the order.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of detailed analysis on the specific contents of the executive order and its legal implications, as well as varying interpretations of historical context and motivations behind the order.

Adam
Messages
65
Reaction score
1
Bush Issues New Secrecy Executive Order


On 25 March 2003 President George W. Bush signed a 31-page Executive Order "Further Amendment to Executive Order 12958, As Amended, Classified National Security Information" (EO 13291) replacing the soon-to-expire Clinton-era E.O. relating to the automatic declassification of federal government documents after 25 years. With a handful of exceptions, the new EO closely corresponds to a draft obtained by the National Coalition for History and distributed via the Internet earlier in March (See "Draft Executive Order Replacing EO 12958 Circulates," NCH WASHINGTON UPDATE, Vol. 9, #11; 13 March 2003).

The announcement of the president's signing the EO appears to have been carefully orchestrated by the White House to minimize public attention to the new order. One press insider characterized the strategy employed by the White House as "advance damage control." The administration tactic managed to short circuit a repeat of the public relations disaster that followed the release of the Presidential Records Act EO in 2001.

More: http://www.archivists.org/news/secrecyorder.asp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One possible reason for this is that it was the late 70s-early 80s that America started really pursuing relationships with Islamic terrorists and dictatorships worldwide. If I were Shrub, I'd want to keep my dad's criminal activities classified too.
 
This is an old story isn't it? (at least it sounds familiar), Bush is trying to make it impossible for the press to get ahold of soon to be declassified documents from the Reagan and Bush I presidencies. It's an obvious and Nixon-esque "cover-up" rumor engine. Hide the facts, destroy your enemy.
 
Originally posted by schwarzchildradius
This is an old story isn't it? (at least it sounds familiar), Bush is trying to make it impossible for the press to get ahold of soon to be declassified documents from the Reagan and Bush I presidencies. It's an obvious and Nixon-esque "cover-up" rumor engine. Hide the facts, destroy your enemy.
This is great news for anyone who wants Bush gone, if we play it right. The media may start exposing his lies when they realize that they can't write those Iran-Contra books that they have been dreaming about.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 264 ·
9
Replies
264
Views
28K