Simplifying the Limit for the Derivative of e^(x-2)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative of the function f(x) = e^(x-2) using the limit definition of a derivative. Participants explore various approaches to simplify the limit expression involved in the derivative calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the limit definition of the derivative and seeks help in simplifying the expression.
  • Another participant suggests factoring out e^(x0) from the numerator and expanding e^(x-x0) in a power series, but this approach is challenged due to restrictions on using power series.
  • A different method is introduced by a participant who uses an alternative definition of the derivative, involving a limit as h approaches 0, and attempts to derive the limit of (e^h - 1)/h.
  • There is a discussion about the notation used for derivatives, with one participant asserting that the differences are merely notational.
  • Concerns are raised about whether an e^(x-2) term remains in the final expression, which is confirmed by another participant, who notes it is multiplied by 1.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the methods to simplify the limit, with no consensus on a single approach. Some methods are challenged or deemed inappropriate, while others are discussed without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about specific steps in their reasoning, particularly regarding the manipulation of limits and the use of power series.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I am asked to find the derivative function of [itex]f(x)=e^{x-2}[/itex] using the definition. That is to say, I have to evaluate this limit, if it exists:

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{e^{x-2} - e^{x_0-2}}{x-x_0} = \lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{e^{x} - e^{x_0}}{e^2 (x-x_0)}[/tex]

How can this undeterminate form be simplified? Thanks.

(The answer is [itex]f'(x_0)=e^{x_0-2}[/itex].)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Factor out exp(x0) from the numerator. Then expand exp(x-x0) in a power series. The rest is obvious.
 
Power serie not allowed, sorry.
 
im used to defining derivatives in a slightly different way, but if you need to it should be easy to convert to your way:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}(e^{(x-2)}) = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{e^{(x-2)+h} - e^{(x-2)}}{h}[/tex]

[tex]= \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} e^{(x-2)} \frac{e^{h} -1}{h}[/tex]

now noting that:

[tex]e = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} (1+h)^{1/h}[/tex]

raising both sides to h (this is the only step I'm not sure about, but it gives the right answer):

[tex]\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} e^h = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} ((1+h)^{1/h})^h = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} 1+h[/tex]

so:
[tex]\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{e^{h} -1}{h}= \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{1 + h -1}{h}= 1[/tex]

which gives the answer.
 
StatusX said:
im used to defining derivatives in a slightly different way, but if you need to it should be easy to convert to your way:

lol, nobody is defining derivatives in different ways...only the notation differs

[tex]h \equiv \Delta x \equiv x - x_0[/tex]
 
yea, that's all i meant.
 
This looks nice Status, but isn't there a [itex]e^{(x-2)}[/itex] remaining?
 
Yes, which is multiplied by 1, giving the answer, as is easily verified using the chain rule.
 
StatusX said:
yea, that's all i meant.

oh ok, sorry
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K