What Went Wrong in Calculating Tensions in These Statics Problems?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of tensions in statics problems involving uniform rods and suspended blocks. In the first problem, the correct tension in string BD is determined to be 32 N, achieved by using a moment arm of 0.6 m for the weight of the rod instead of 0.9 m. The second problem involves a 960 N block, where the correct tension in cable BC is calculated to be 1600 N by accounting for the weight of the beam and using the appropriate moment equation. Key mistakes included incorrect moment arm calculations and neglecting the beam's weight.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Knowledge of moment arm calculations in physics
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, specifically Arctangent
  • Ability to set up and solve equations for forces and moments
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in greater detail
  • Learn about moment arm calculations and their significance in statics
  • Explore trigonometric applications in physics, focusing on tension calculations
  • Practice solving various statics problems involving multiple forces and moments
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those specializing in mechanics and statics, as well as educators teaching physics concepts related to forces and equilibrium.

Shay10825
Messages
337
Reaction score
0
1.) A uniform rod AB is 1.2 m long and weighs 16 N. It is suspended by vertical strings AC and BD. A block P weighing 96 N is attached at E, .3 m from A. The tension in the string BD is?
http://img116.exs.cx/img116/2822/STATICS1.jpg
I did:

(.3m)(96N)+ (.9m)(16N) - (1.2 m)(x) = 0
x=36N

But the answer is 32 N

What did I do wrong??

2.) A 960 N block is suspended as shown. The beam is weightless and is hinged to the watt at A. The tensions in the cable BC is?
http://img116.exs.cx/img116/364/statics2.jpg

I did:

(4m)(960N)=t
t=3840

The answer is 1600 N.

~Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your first answer, you got the arithmetic wrong - I used the same pivot point you did and got 32N.

In your second, you need to do a little trigonometry. The vertical component of the tension is 960N. Figure out what the total tension needs to be to get a vertical component of that magnitude. (Hint: you can get the angle at B with an Arctangent function.)
 


In the first problem, you have correctly set up the equation for the sum of forces in the vertical direction. However, you have made a mistake in calculating the moment arm for the weight of the rod (16N). The moment arm should be 0.6m, not 0.9m. This gives you a final answer of 32N, which is the correct answer.

In the second problem, you have correctly set up the equation for the sum of moments about point A. However, you have not taken into account the weight of the beam itself. The weight of the beam creates a clockwise moment about point A, which needs to be subtracted from the total moment in order to find the tension in the cable. The correct equation should be:

(4m)(960N) - (2m)(x) - (2m)(160N) = 0

Solving for x gives you a tension of 1600N, which is the correct answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
49
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K