Register to reply 
Operations on limit 
Share this thread: 
#1
Nov1604, 06:07 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 4,771

My Real Analysis textbook says: Let f,g: D > R be two functions of common domain D that posses a limit at x_0 an accumulation point of D. Then, f/g as a limit at x_0 and this limit is the quotient of the limit of f to the limit of g, as long as [itex]g \neq 0 \ \forall x \ \epsilon \ D[/itex] and that the limit of g is not 0.
Does this mean that if the limit of g is zero we cannot conclude or could we extend the theorem to: if the limit of g is 0, then the limit of f/g does not exist? 


#3
Nov1604, 08:33 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 4,771

Is that a synonim of "the limit does not exist" ?



#4
Nov1604, 08:50 PM

HW Helper
P: 2,567

Operations on limit
I would say no, that the limit would be defined as infinity. for example, the limit as 1/x goes to 0 from the right is positive infinity, because 1 goes to 1 and x goes to 0. An example of an undefined limit would be the limit as x goes to 0 of sin(1/x).



#5
Nov1704, 07:57 AM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,490

No. If g> 0, then we the limit may or may not exist.
Obvious examples: Take f(x)= x, g(x)= x on the domain (0, 1). Then x= 0 is a an accumulation point. lim(x>0) f(x)= 0 and limit(x>0) g(x)= 0 so we can't use (lim f(x))/(lim g(x)). But obviously f(x)/g(x)= 1 for all x in (0,1) so the limit as x> 0 is just 1. Take f(x)= x(x+a), g(x)= x on the domain (0,1). Again, g(x)> 0 so we can't use (lim f(x)/lim g(x)). But obviously f(x)/g(x)= x+a for all x in (0,1) so the limit as x> 0 is just a. (The point of this example is that the "indeterminate" form 0/0 can give ANY number as limit.) Take f(x)= x+ 1, g(x)= x on the domain (0,1). Again g(x)> 0 so we can't use (lim f(x)/lim g(x)). Here, for x close to 0, f(x) is close to 1 so we have f(x)/g(x)= 1/ very small number which give a very large number. There is no limit in this case. (In general if g(x)>0 and f(x)> nonzero number, there is no limit for f(x)/g(x). If BOTH f(x) and g(x) go to 0, then there may not be a limit or the limit may be any number. 


#6
Nov1704, 01:41 PM

HW Helper
P: 2,567

maybe that's true, that limits with no bounds are said not to exist, but I think there is a big difference between a function that gets bigger and bigger in one direction as you move towards a point and one which stays finite, but does not settle on any value, such as sin(1/x) as x goes to 0.



#7
Nov1904, 07:43 AM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,490

Yes, that's true. That's why some times we will say the limit "is infinity" or "is negative infinity" rather than just saying the limit does not exist. The limit STILL doesn't exist but you have a little more information about why it doesn't exist.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Operations across an inequality  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  15  
A sequence of operations  General Math  14  
Tonsils took out when i was a kid  General Discussion  22  
Read a book of analysis  General Math  3  
Fast operations  General Math  1 