Can complex exponential e^{ix} be proven without using Taylor series?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the proof of the identity e^{ix} = cos x + i sin x without utilizing Taylor series. Participants explore alternative methods of proof, including derivatives and integrals, while seeking clarity on definitions of the involved functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to find a proof of e^{ix} = cos x + i sin x that does not rely on Taylor series, suggesting a connection to derivatives.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of defining e^z and cos z before proceeding with the proof.
  • A different participant proposes a second-order differential equation, \frac {d^2w}{dz^2} + w = 0, suggesting that its solutions can lead to the desired identity.
  • One participant provides a detailed derivation involving complex logarithms and integrals, ultimately arriving at the identity e^{ix} = cos x + i sin x, questioning if this aligns with the original inquiry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single method of proof, and multiple approaches are presented, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the necessity of defining functions like e^z and cos z, which may affect the validity of the proofs discussed. The reliance on different mathematical techniques introduces varying assumptions that are not fully explored.

eddo
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
[tex]e^{ix}=cosx + isinx[/tex]

I know this can be easily proven using the Taylor series, but I recall seeing a proof which doesn't use the Taylor series. I'm pretty sure it has something to do with derivatives, but the problem is I don't remember how it went and I can't find it anywhere. So if anyone knows it or has any idea of where to start could you let me know? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Once you want to ask that question, you must first ask yourself how you wish to define things like e^z and cos z.
 
You might consider that if [itex]w = e^{iz}[/itex] then

[tex]\frac {d^2w}{dz^2} + w = 0[/itex]<br /> <br /> from which <br /> <br /> [tex]w = A \cos z + B \sin z[/tex]<br /> <br /> Does that help?[/tex]
 
[tex]z=\cos x + i\sin x[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dz}{dx}=-\sin x + i\cos x=i^2\sin x + i\cos x=i(\cos x + i\sin x )=i.z[/tex]

[tex]\int\frac{1}{z}\;dz=i\int dx[/tex]

[tex]\ln|z|=ix+c[/tex]

When x=0, z=1 => c=0.

[tex]\ln|z|=ix[/tex]

[tex]e^{ix}=z[/tex]

[tex]e^{ix}=\cos x + i\sin x[/tex]


Is that what you're talking about?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K