Setting the equ. of motion help

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving the equations of motion for a mechanical system using Newton's laws, specifically comparing results obtained through Lagrange's equations. The equations identified are: m_1 (\ddot{x_1} - \ddot{x}) + k_1 x_1 = 0, m_2 (\ddot{x} + \ddot{x_2}) + k_2 x_2 = 0, and m_1(\ddot{x} - \ddot{x_1}) + m_2 (\ddot{x} + \ddot{x_2}) + m_3 \ddot{x} = 0. The author clarifies that the third equation represents the motion of the center of mass and emphasizes the importance of consistent coordinate systems when analyzing forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Newton's laws of motion
  • Lagrange's equations of motion
  • Understanding of mechanical systems and forces
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations of motion using Newton's laws
  • Explore the application of Lagrange's equations in complex systems
  • Learn about the concept of center of mass in mechanical systems
  • Investigate coordinate transformations in dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying dynamics or looking to deepen their understanding of motion equations in mechanical systems.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I have to find the equations of motion using Newton's laws for this system (see attached file). I have found them using Lagrange's equations and compared with a friend's results: we have the same.

[tex]m_1 (\ddot{x_1} - \ddot{x}) + k_1 x_1 = 0[/tex]

[tex]m_2 (\ddot{x} + \ddot{x_2}) + k_2 x_2 = 0[/tex]

[tex]m_1(\ddot{x} - \ddot{x_1}) + m_2 (\ddot{x} + \ddot{x_2}) + m_3 \ddot{x} = 0[/tex]


But how do we arrive to that with Newton's laws? Why isn't it simply [itex]m_1 \ddot{x_1} + k_1 x_1 = 0[/itex] for [itex]m_1[/itex] ?!


eee.. I should have posted this in the homework help section, I apologize.
 

Attachments

  • phys.jpg
    phys.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 412
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I found the third one; it's the equation of motion for the center of mass of the system.
 
And the other 2 work too if you consider the position of m1 and m2 as being mesured from the same axe as the position of m3 (i.e. the coordinate x) and take care of inverting the sign of the force on m1 because the x1 coordinate is measured in the opposite direction to x.

(I'm writting this because a lot of people have checked the thread but no one answered. So some people may be interested in the solution.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K