Finding orthonormal set using Gram-Schmidt and least squares


by tatianaiistb
Tags: gram-schmidt, least squares, subspaces
tatianaiistb
tatianaiistb is offline
#1
Oct26-11, 09:20 PM
P: 47
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

A) Find an orthonormal set q1, q2, q3 for which q1,q2 span the column space A [1 1; 2, -1; -2,4] (this is a 3x2 matrix).

B) Which fundamental subspace contains q3?

C) What is the least-squares solution of Ax=b if b=[1 2 7]T?

2. Relevant equations

Gram-Schmidt

3. The attempt at a solution

A) So I figured out q1, q2, and q3 using Gram-Schmidt process. These are q1 = [1/3 2/3 -2/3]T, q2 = [2/3 1/3 2/3]T, and q3 = +-[-2/3 2/3 1/3]T

B) Don't know how to determine this

C) For the least square, since they are orthonormal sets, I used the formula x= [q1Tb; q2Tb] However, I'm not getting the right answer. In addition, I tried doing it the long way using the formula x=(ATA)-1ATb, I'm getting even different numbers... Please help!
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur
Hackathon team's GoogolPlex gives Siri extra powers
Bright points in Sun's atmosphere mark patterns deep in its interior
TheoMcCloskey
TheoMcCloskey is offline
#2
Oct27-11, 12:06 PM
P: 181
You found the orthonormal set (Q), but that is not equal to A. What is A equal to?
tatianaiistb
tatianaiistb is offline
#3
Oct27-11, 01:46 PM
P: 47
[1 1
2 -1 = A
-2 4]

I'm now only having trouble with part C. Thanks!

TheoMcCloskey
TheoMcCloskey is offline
#4
Oct27-11, 02:00 PM
P: 181

Finding orthonormal set using Gram-Schmidt and least squares


Yes, I understand. But there is another way to represent [itex]A[/itex] using the orthogonal basis that you constructed and another factor of [itex]A[/itex]. This factor, call it [itex]R[/itex], is an upper right triangular matrix. [itex]R[/itex] is constructed such that [itex]QR = A[/itex]. We note [itex]Q[/itex] is orthogonal so [itex]Q^{T} = Q[/itex]. Thus, using this factorization for [itex]A[/itex] in the normal equations yields a linear triangualr system for solving the Least Squares problem.
TheoMcCloskey
TheoMcCloskey is offline
#5
Oct27-11, 02:02 PM
P: 181
I should add that, as part of the construction of Q, you will have already computed the elements of R.
tatianaiistb
tatianaiistb is offline
#6
Oct27-11, 06:50 PM
P: 47
Thanks Theo! I do understand about A=QR and the construction of it. But I don't understand how that can help me finding x(hat), which is the least-squares solution.

What I was thinking is that x(hat)=Q^T*b because Q has already orthonormal vectors.

I'm getting that x(hat) = (-3 6 3)^T, but it says the solution is supposed to be x(hat) = [1 2]^T which they supposedly got from q1^Tb and q2^Tb. However, if I multiply the very same q's I got (which I was confirmed are correct) by the given b, I'm not getting the given answer. So I'm going in circles... Any help?
TheoMcCloskey
TheoMcCloskey is offline
#7
Oct28-11, 06:54 AM
P: 181
Firstly, let me make a correction to one of my previous posts (post #4).

We note [itex]Q[/itex] is orthogonal so [itex]Q^{T}=Q[/itex].
should read

We note [itex]Q[/itex] is orthogonal so [itex]Q^{T}=Q^{-1}[/itex].
Secondly, return to the Normal equations for the Least Squares solution:

[tex]
A^{T}A \, x = A^{T} \, b
[/tex]
Now substitute the factor expresion for [itex]A[/itex], ie, [itex]A=QR[/itex]
[tex](QR)^{T}(QR)\,x = (QR)^{T}b[/tex]
[tex]R^{T}(Q^{T}Q)\,R\,x = R^{T}Q^{T}b[/tex]
[tex]R^{T}R\,x = R^{T}Q^{T}b[/tex]
since [itex]Q^{T}Q=I[/itex]. Now pre-multiply both sides by [itex]R^{-T}[/itex] to yield
[tex]R\,x = Q^{T}b[/tex]
It is this system that you need to solve for [itex]x[/itex] to yield the Least Squares solution. Remember, just because you found the orthogonal basis for [itex]A[/itex] doesn't mean its equal to [itex]A[/itex] . There is a certain amount of translation and rotation of that basis to yield that [itex]A[/itex] (hence the [itex]R[/itex] factor).

Remember, [itex]R[/itex] is triangular, so a simple backsolve operation will yield the solution (no need to compute [itex]R^{-1}[/itex]).


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Gram-Schmidt procedure to find orthonormal basis Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Orthonormal basis/Gram-Schmidt [Easy?] Calculus & Beyond Homework 6
Gram-Schmidt orthonormal basis Calculus & Beyond Homework 6
Gram-Schmidt problem - I'm stuck Linear & Abstract Algebra 9
Gram Schmidt Linear & Abstract Algebra 2