Understanding Enthalpy and Temperature in Ideal Gas Systems

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rizer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of enthalpy in ideal gas systems, specifically addressing the relationships between enthalpy, internal energy, and temperature. Participants explore the equations governing these relationships and the implications for different types of gases, including monatomic and diatomic gases.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants present the equation for enthalpy as H = U + PV and derive it for ideal gases, questioning the validity of using H = 3nRT/2 + nRT.
  • It is noted that the derived equation is correct for monatomic ideal gases, but the specific heat capacity for non-monatomic gases varies with temperature, leading to different expressions for enthalpy.
  • One participant raises concerns about discrepancies in calculated enthalpy values compared to examples found online, suggesting that the ideal gas assumption may not hold in certain cases.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the ideal gas model may not accurately represent complex gases like R-134a and points out the need for caution when applying specific heat formulas outside their valid regimes.
  • Participants discuss the dependence of enthalpy graphs on both temperature and pressure, questioning whether this is solely due to deviations from ideal gas behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the correct approach to calculating enthalpy for different types of gases, and multiple competing views remain regarding the applicability of the ideal gas law and the behavior of specific heat capacities.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the specific heat capacities for diatomic gases change with temperature, and the ideal gas model may not be suitable for all gases, particularly at higher temperatures or for complex molecules.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals interested in thermodynamics, particularly those studying the behavior of gases and the calculations involving enthalpy in various contexts.

Rizer
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I know enthalpy

H = U + PV

and for ideal gas, PV = nRT so it becomes

H = U + nRT

However, U = 3NkT/2 = 3nRT/2 for ideal gas as well.

So why is it incorrect to put

H = 3nRT/2 + nRT ??

Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
Rizer said:
I know enthalpy

H = U + PV

and for ideal gas, PV = nRT so it becomes

H = U + nRT

However, U = 3NkT/2 = 3nRT/2 for ideal gas as well.

So why is it incorrect to put

H = 3nRT/2 + nRT ??

Thanks
It is correct for a monatomic ideal gas (only).

AM
 
Thanks Andrew, but what about using H = 5nRT/2 + nRT or H = 7nRT/2 + nRT etc. for ideal gases made up of molecules?
 
Rizer said:
Thanks Andrew, but what about using H = 5nRT/2 + nRT or H = 7nRT/2 + nRT etc. for ideal gases made up of molecules?
For non-monatomic ideal gas, the specific heat will depend upon temperature. A diatomic ideal gas will have a Cv of 5R/2 at temperatures below around 1000K but as temperatures increase the Cv increases and eventually reaches 7R/2

AM
 
But why does the graphs of Enthalpy usually depends on both T and P? Is it solely because the gas is not an ideal gas??

The Enthalpy graph I found:
http://www.nt.ntnu.no/users/haugwarb/Phase_diagrams_and_thermodynamic_tables/PhaseDiagrams/R134a.pdf


I also found this example:
http://www.learnthermo.com/examples/ch05/p-5c-3.php

In EQN 4, the example applied the equation of state for ideal gas, so I suppose it is treating the gas as an ideal gas.
But when I try to calculate the enthalpy using H = (3 or 5 or 7)nRT/2 + nRT, the values mismatch the value of H1 = 87.41 kJ/kg and H2 = 239.78 kJ/kg in the example, even after converting kJ/mol into kJ/kg using the provided molar mass of 29g/mole...


Please help me on this, this issue has been troubling me for long, thank you very much
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Enthalpy graph I found:
This graph is for water liquid/vapor. Clearly not an ideal gas! :smile:
I also found this example:
How do your answers for H compare to the values given in http://www.wiley.com/college/moran/CL_0471465704_S/user/tables/TABLE5S/table5sframe.html" table for air? (Note that everything in the table is in Kelvin except for the first column!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rizer said:
I know enthalpy

H = U + PV

and for ideal gas, PV = nRT so it becomes

H = U + nRT

However, U = 3NkT/2 = 3nRT/2 for ideal gas as well.

So why is it incorrect to put

H = 3nRT/2 + nRT ??

Thanks

For an ideal gas,

R = cp - cv

This is entirely consistent with writing

u = cvT

and

h = cpT

although you should be cautious to use these formulas only in the regime where the specific heats are constant. In the more general case, cv = du/dT and cp = dh/dT. If the specific heats are not constant, you have to integrate from some reference temperature.

The formula you wrote with cv=(3/2)R is only appropriate for monatomic ideal gases. As you point out, for diatomic ideal gases, the coefficient is 5/2 because of the extra degrees of freedom available at room temperature, although as the temperature rises above ~1E3 K for gases like O2 and N2, additional modes become unfrozen and cv/R rises. At some point the ideal gas model doesn't work all that well. I would point out that complex gases like R-134 aren't all that well-modeled by the ideal gas law.

BBB
 
Bill_K said:
This graph is for water liquid/vapor. Clearly not an ideal gas! :smile:

How do your answers for H compare to the values given in http://www.wiley.com/college/moran/CL_0471465704_S/user/tables/TABLE5S/table5sframe.html" table for air? (Note that everything in the table is in Kelvin except for the first column!

Thanks a lot! Now I am clear about the concept.

I tried to calculate h using the table you provided, and the values matched well with the formula H = 5nRT/2 + nRT

bbbeard said:
For an ideal gas,

R = cp - cv

This is entirely consistent with writing

u = cvT

and

h = cpT

although you should...

Thanks for your detailed explanations, which furthers my understandings on this topic. And now I am sure that R-134a can't be modeled as an ideal gas.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K