Ann Coulter is *THE* funniest person of our times

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses the comedic and satirical contributions of Ann Coulter, particularly in relation to her remarks on military issues and government programs. Participants explore varying opinions on her humor and political commentary, as well as the implications of privatization in military and law enforcement contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant highlights Ann Coulter's comments on military armor as a reflection of government inefficiency, suggesting that her satire reinforces their views on conservative skepticism towards government programs.
  • Another participant expresses disagreement with Coulter's views but acknowledges her appeal in liberal criticism, indicating a complex relationship with her humor.
  • Some participants draw parallels between Coulter's commentary and that of other political satirists, such as Al Franken, suggesting a shared understanding of political humor across the spectrum.
  • There is a discussion about the potential benefits of a corporate mercenary army, with one participant arguing that it could operate without government constraints, while another sarcastically comments on the reliability of market forces to regulate corporate behavior.
  • A participant provides information about DynCorp's contracts and operations, raising questions about the role of private companies in military and law enforcement activities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding Ann Coulter's humor and political stance. While some appreciate her satirical approach, others are critical of her views, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific examples and anecdotes related to military operations and privatization, but there are no settled conclusions regarding the effectiveness or morality of these approaches.

wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
Earlier tonight on MSNBC's Scarburough Country, Pat Buchanan was subbing for Joe Scarburough, and Ann Coulter was a guest on the show. Buchanan brought up the topic of that National Guard troop from Louisiana who asked Rumsfeld why the army didn't have proper armor for their Humvees and as a result needed to scrounge through a junk yard to find old steel and comprimised ballistic glass to armor their Humvees. Ann Coulter, being the comic genius she is answered with something along the lines of this:

"Well, first of all, let me say that it ISN'T unprecedented for this sort of thing to happen. In WWI and WWII, troops NOTORIOUSLY complained about the situations they were in, and troops have a right to complain, since they're putting their lives on the line. I just want to stress that this isn't unusual. But on to the question, I think that the lack of armor these troops have just goes to show that government programs don't work in general, this is why conservatives don't like government programs."
:smile: :smile: :smile:

She's just re-affirmed my position that she is the most brilliant satirist to ever live.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have to say, i disagree with at least 50% of everything that comes out of her mouth, but the vast liberal bashing earns her a place right next to the ammo stash in my Waco style hideout.
 
franznietzsche said:
I have to say, i disagree with at least 50% of everything that comes out of her mouth, but the vast liberal bashing earns her a place right next to the ammo stash in my Waco style hideout.

:smile:
So there are others in on the joke!

By that same logic, I'd have a copy of Al Franken's "Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them" stashed away right under Das Kapital.
 
Last edited:
wasteofo2 said:
But on to the question, I think that the lack of armor these troops have just goes to show that government programs don't work in general, this is why conservatives don't like government programs."
:smile: :smile: :smile:


yeah a corporate mercenary army would be much better, given that it's not tainted by any government involvement, and also wouldn't be constrained by international agreements like the geneva convention
 
Last edited:
don't worry, market forces will keep corporate morals in check ;)
 
fourier jr said:
yeah a corporate mercenary army would be much better, given that it's not tainted by any government involvement, and also wouldn't be constrained by international agreements like the geneva convention

The U.S. State Department awarded DynCorp a multimillion-dollar contract to advise the Iraqi government on setting up effective law enforcement, judicial and correctional agencies. DynCorp will arrange for up to 1,000 U.S. civilian law enforcement experts to travel to Iraq to help locals "assess threats to public order" and mentor personnel at the municipal, provincial and national levels. The company will also provide any logistical or technical support necessary for this peacekeeping project. DynCorp estimates it could recoup up to $50 million for the first year of the contract.

Already armed DynCorp employees make up the core of the police force in Bosnia. DynCorp troops protect Afghan president Hamid Karzai, while DynCorp planes and pilots fly the defoliation missions over the coca crops in Colombia. Back home in the United States Dyncorp is in charge of the border posts between the US and Mexico, many of the Pentagon's weapons-testing ranges and the entire Air Force One fleet of presidential planes and helicopters

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=DynCorp
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K