Can Classic Greek Problems Be Solved with Basic Geometry?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classic Greek problems of squaring the circle, doubling the volume of a cube, and trisecting an arbitrary angle using basic geometry. Participants explore how to explain the impossibility of these problems without delving into advanced concepts like field theory, considering the audience's potential lack of exposure to such topics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about explaining the impossibility of the classic problems without using field theory, suggesting a need for simpler explanations.
  • Another participant provides links to historical resources that may assist in understanding these problems.
  • A participant shares an anecdote about a failed legislative attempt in Indiana to redefine the value of pi to facilitate squaring the circle, highlighting the cultural implications of these mathematical challenges.
  • One participant mentions that Archimedes found a method to trisect an angle using a paper strip, questioning the restrictions placed on geometric constructions and the understanding of tools among students.
  • Another participant notes the existence of theories that allow for constructions with a marked straight edge, suggesting alternative approaches to the problems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on how to best explain the impossibility of the classic problems, and multiple viewpoints regarding the use of tools and methods in geometry are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the audience's familiarity with mathematical concepts, which may affect the presentation of the problems. The discussion also touches on historical attempts to redefine mathematical constants, reflecting broader societal interactions with mathematics.

gravenewworld
Messages
1,129
Reaction score
27
I have to give a presentation for geometry, and I chose to do my presentation on the impossiblity of squaring the circle, doubling the volume of a cube, and trisection of an arbitrary angle with Euclidean tools. The problem is though, that I am certain the majority of the class has never been exposed to any field theory at all. Does anyone have any ideas of how I can possibly explain the proofs of why these problems are impossible without having to go to field theory? I mean I will go to field theory if I have to, but then again, no one would understand unless there is a way to easily explain field theory without using heavy duty concepts, like using polynomials etc.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
gravenewworld said:
I have to give a presentation for geometry, and I chose to do my presentation on the impossiblity of squaring the circle, doubling the volume of a cube, and trisection of an arbitrary angle with Euclidean tools. The problem is though, that I am certain the majority of the class has never been exposed to any field theory at all. Does anyone have any ideas of how I can possibly explain the proofs of why these problems are impossible without having to go to field theory? I mean I will go to field theory if I have to, but then again, no one would understand unless there is a way to easily explain field theory without using heavy duty concepts, like using polynomials etc.

it looks like that hist of math site has done all your research for you. just look up 1/2 dozen of the references & you're 90% of the way there. all you've got to do is write it up!
 
Thanks a lot for your help. LOL while doing research on these problems, I found this interesting journal article. The legislature in Indiana actually tried to pass legislation in order to change the value of pi first to 4 and then to 3.2 so that the squaring the circle problem could be solved. The legislation actually made it through the House unanimously, but the Senate postponed voting on the bill indefinitely (it can still be voted on today).
 
I pointed this out before, but Archemedies did trisect the angle by using a paper strip.http://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/archi.shtml

The method is called "illicit," in the article, as if mathematicians were more busy inventing restrictions than solving problems. Quote from above: "It's thus specifically forbidden to use a ruler for the sake of measurement," WHY? Every student has one today.

This also leads to the fact, that in my day, some students believed that they would astonish the mathematical world by trisecting the angle and spent a great deal of time on that. Actually nobody in my high school class understood the difference between a straight edge and a ruler anyway, which was never gone into.
 
Last edited:
There is also a theory of those constructions which allow a marked straight edge (ruler).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
10K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K