Is the Inverse of f(x) a Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aisha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Inverse
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether the inverse of the function f(x) = 5√(x+1) + 2, defined for x ≥ -1, is itself a function. Participants express confusion regarding the domain restriction and the process of finding the inverse, particularly in relation to squaring both sides of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the necessity of the domain restriction x ≥ -1 and discuss the implications of squaring both sides to eliminate the square root. Some explore the definition of a function and the conditions under which an inverse can be considered a function, referencing the concept of strictly increasing functions.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the conditions for a function to have an inverse that is also a function. There is acknowledgment of the theorem related to strictly increasing functions, and some participants express clarity on the topic after engaging with the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of the domain and the behavior of the function within that domain, including the relevance of the vertical line test in determining whether a relation is a function.

aisha
Messages
584
Reaction score
0
f(x)=5*the square root of (x+1) +2 x>=-1

determine if the inverse is a function.

I don't understand y are they telling me x>=-1? Also I know how to find the inverse but what do I do to each side of the equation to get rid of the square root? ^2? I got the inverse= [x^(2)-1]/25 I don't think this is right. How do u do this question? :confused: :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aisha said:
f(x)=5*the square root of (x+1) +2 x>=-1

determine if the inverse is a function.

I don't understand y are they telling me x>=-1? Also I know how to find the inverse but what do I do to each side of the equation to get rid of the square root? ^2? I got the inverse= [x^(2)-1]/25 I don't think this is right. How do u do this question? :confused: :cry:

[tex]f(x)=5\sqrt{x+1}+2, x>=-1[/tex]

The square root is only defined if the number in the root is >=0. Since x+1>=0, x>=-1.

To get rid of the square root, square both sides

To find the inverse:
[tex]y=5\sqrt{x+1}+2[/tex]
[tex]y-2=5\sqrt{x+1}[/tex]
[tex](y-2)^2=(5\sqrt{x+1})^2[/tex]
[tex](y-2)^2=25(x+1)[/tex]
[tex]x=\frac{(y-2)^2}{25}-1[/tex]
[tex]f^{-1}(x)=\frac{(x-2)^2}{25}-1[/tex]
 
learningphysics said:
[tex]f(x)=5\sqrt{x+1}+2, x>=-1[/tex]

The square root is only defined if the number in the root is >=0. Since x+1>=0, x>=-1.

To get rid of the square root, square both sides

To find the inverse:
[tex]y=5\sqrt{x+1}+2[/tex]
[tex]y-2=5\sqrt{x+1}[/tex]
[tex](y-2)^2=(5\sqrt{x+1})^2[/tex]
[tex](y-2)^2=25(x+1)[/tex]
[tex]x=\frac{(y-2)^2}{25}-1[/tex]
[tex]f^{-1}(x)=\frac{(x-2)^2}{25}-1[/tex]

THANKS SOOOO MUCH I GET IT TOTALLY
 
How do u find out if the inverse is a function?
 
A relation between a dependent and an dependent variable is said to be a function if to each value taken by the dependent variable, the dependent variable takes one and only one value.

There is a theorem that you can use that allows you to answer the question without even having to find the inverse: If a function has an interval for a domain and if it is strictly increasing, it has an inverse (i.e. the inverse is a function).

You are given the domain of your function: it is all numbers x such that [itex]x\geq -1[/itex]. That's an interval. It's the interval [itex][-1, +\infty[[/itex]. So all you need to do is show that the function is strictly increasing. That is to say, we must show that for any two distinct points of the domain, say [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] such that [itex]x_1 < x_2[/itex], the two corresponding images of these two points by the function f are such that [itex]f(x_1) < f(x_2)[/itex].

This is not hard to do. I'll do your problem as an exemple.

Consider [itex]x_1, x_2[/itex] two points of the domain such that [itex]x_1 < x_2[/itex]. This inequality implies that [itex]f(x_1) < f(x_2)[/itex] iff (if and only if, noted [itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex])

[tex]5\sqrt{x_1+1}+2 < 5\sqrt{x_2+1}+2 \Leftrightarrow 5\sqrt{x_1+1} < 5\sqrt{x_2+1} \Leftrightarrow \sqrt{x_1+1} < \sqrt{x_2+1} \Leftrightarrow x_1+1 < x_2+1 \Leftrightarrow x_1 < x_2[/tex]

,which we have supposed to be true. Therefor our proposition according to which [itex]x_1 < x_2[/itex] implies [itex]f(x_1) < f(x_2)[/itex] is true. So our function is stricly increasing and according to the theorem, the inverse is a function.


Or, if you know calculus, you can show that a function is strictly increasing by showing that the derivative is positive everywhere on the domain.
 
A particular relation is a function, if for an element in the domain, there is only one element in the range. Or in other words, for a particular x value, you only get 1 y.

For example:
y=3x+1 is a function because when you plug in an x value, you only get 1 y.

On the other hand
[tex]y=\pm\sqrt{x}, where\ x\geq 0[/tex]

is not a function because, for a positive x you get 2 y values.

This is also called the vertical line test... If you plot your relation, and any vertical line you can draw intersects your plot at at most one point... then it's a function. If there's a vertical line you can draw that intersects your graph at two or more points then it's not a function.

The inverse relation in your problem is a function because you only get one y when you plug in an x value.
 
Hey guys thanks sooo much I understand now. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K