Explore EMF Induction: Why & How It Occurs

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DeathKnight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf Induction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on electromagnetic induction, specifically why a moving conductor experiences induced electromotive force (emf) and the implications for connecting a fuse to an AC generator. Participants explore theoretical aspects of induction, practical wiring concerns, and safety considerations related to grounding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the induction of emf in a moving conductor is related to changing magnetic flux, but the underlying reasons remain unclear.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of Maxwell's equations in understanding the induction process, stating that without accepting these equations, the question of "why" remains inadequately addressed.
  • Another participant describes the Lorentz force acting on electrons and ions in a conductor moving through a magnetic field, leading to charge separation and induced potential difference.
  • Concerns are raised about connecting a fuse to an AC generator, with one participant stating that specific wiring documentation is necessary to determine which wire is live or neutral.
  • Several participants discuss grounding practices for generators, noting that grounding can limit potential to ground and prevent dangerous voltage levels, but there is disagreement on the implications of floating systems versus grounded systems.
  • One participant challenges the assertion that an ungrounded generator could reach high voltage levels, arguing that a complete current path is necessary for danger to arise.
  • Another participant shares personal experiences and examples to illustrate the complexities of grounding and safety in electrical systems, emphasizing the need for a complete circuit for perceptible current flow.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of emf induction and the safety implications of grounding practices. There is no consensus on the best approach to connecting fuses or the risks associated with floating versus grounded systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific hardware and wiring configurations, indicating that answers may depend on detailed schematics and individual setups. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the conditions under which dangerous voltages may arise.

DeathKnight
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
emf induction...

Why does a moving conductor becomes induced with an emf? Well I know it has to do something with changing magnetic flux. The thing I want to know is why the changing magnetic flux leads to e.m.f. induction?

Secondly, we have an A.C. generator in which the coil is rotated to produce the current. I'm given the task to connect a fuse to one of the wires leading out of the generator. How would I which one is live wire and which one is neutral considering that the direction of the currect is continuosly changing?
Thanks in advance for any help. :approve:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is not a real good question in physics, unless you are able accept Maxwells equations as a reason why. The understanding of how a current is induced will come with an understanding of Maxwell. In the truest sense of the word WHY, we can only say, because it does.

As for the problem with your fuse, there is now way that question can be answered without a schematic diagram of the wireing of the geneator. How can we possibly answer a question about specific hardware without documentation? You will need to ask the designer or the plant engineer about that.
 
the change of B-field lead EMF is like the change of momentum leads force
 
One way to understand how an emf is induced in a moving conductor (IN A MAGNETIC FIELD!) is to recognize that the conductor is made up of electrons and ions. Charges that move in a magnetic field are subject to the Lorentz force which tends to push electrons in one direction and ions in the other direction. The ions are essentially fixed (lattice) while the electrons are mobile. In effect this causes a charge separation thereby inducing a potential difference across the conductor with the resulting electric field eventually balancing the Lorentz force.
 
A stand alone generator (or alternator) with all leads isolated is considered a "floating" power supply. If the output voltage is 115 you can ground either one and fuse the other. If it's 230 volts, there should be a center tap (neutral) that can be grounded, then fuse the other 2 leads.
The reason for grounding is to limit the potential to ground; an ungrounded 115 volt alternator could read 1000 volts or more to actual ground, creating a dangerous condition.
 
Integral said:
As for the problem with your fuse, there is now way that question can be answered without a schematic diagram of the wireing of the geneator.

Well, Here is a simple generator with wiring. What do you say now?
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    7.9 KB · Views: 512
Last edited:
I am not going to say what I am thinking.

Put the fuse in the load line.
 
Is it too complicated or is my question too dumb?
 
Last edited:
The drawing you provided is not a schematic of an operating generator. In that drawing there is only one possible place for a fuse. It must go in the load line. But that does not answer the question you asked. Which seemed, to me, to be a specific quesition about a specific generator. A fuse must be placed in a current carrying load line is the general answer.
 
  • #10
wire2 said:
...The reason for grounding is to limit the potential to ground; an ungrounded 115 volt alternator could read 1000 volts or more to actual ground, creating a dangerous condition.

Incorrect as written. To be dangerous, there must be a complete current path from the voltage source, through the load (person), and back to the voltage source. Additionally, what would create the 1000 volt potential?
 
  • #11
GENIERE said:
Incorrect as written. To be dangerous, there must be a complete current path from the voltage source, through the load (person), and back to the voltage source. Additionally, what would create the 1000 volt potential?

It's written from experience. A defective tool or appliance can have exposed parts live. Simply holding one while standing on concrete with leather soled shoes will complete the circuit. Many people have felt an electrical shock this way at one time or other.
An ungrounded power source, be it a Y connected transformer secondary or a portable generator, can have the potential float to an unsafe level (compared to actual ground) if there's no physical connection through a resistor or lamp to reference it.
Many years ago bathroom receptacles were fed through a 115/115 volt isolating transformer to limit the risk of electric shock. Touching one side or the other would pull that side to zero volts (if touching the sink or taps).
One more example, you run a portable generator (which has rubber vibration mounts and feet). With a high input resistance meter, measure between a real ground (steel fence post etc.) and the hot lead of the generator. It might read 115 volts, or 60, or 0, or 500. There's no real reference.
 
  • #12
wire2 said:
It's written from experience. A defective tool or appliance can have exposed parts live. Simply holding one while standing on concrete with leather soled shoes will complete the circuit. Many people have felt an electrical shock this way at one time or other.
If the system is referenced to ground that is indeed the case. If the system was floating, the circuit path is not complete, thus near zero current flow through the person. The small current is a result of small capacitance coupling to the Earth but never the less; the current would be limited to a few micro amps and not hazardous. This is why a floating system is safer than a ground referenced system as in your example…
wire2 said:
Many years ago bathroom receptacles were fed through a 115/115 volt isolating transformer to limit the risk of electric shockTouching one side or the other would pull that side to zero volts (if touching the sink or taps).
In the above example, to receive a perceptible shock, it is necessary for one or the other terminals to be connected to ground (converting it to a ground referenced system) before one can receive a perceptible shock by contacting the other terminal and ground.
wire2 said:
An ungrounded power source, be it a Y connected transformer secondary or a portable generator, can have the potential float to an unsafe level (compared to actual ground) if there's no physical connection through a resistor or lamp to reference it.
Linemen routinely service multi-kilovolt power distribution systems and do so safely as long as they are not in contact with either of the other two phases or ground and not within the arc-over distance. Again, if there is not a complete circuit, no perceptual current will flow; just ask the birds.
wire2 said:
One more example, you run a portable generator (which has rubber vibration mounts and feet). With a high input resistance meter, measure between a real ground (steel fence post etc.) and the hot lead of the generator. It might read 115 volts, or 60, or 0, or 500. There's no real reference.
Electricians I’ve spoken to sometimes refer to the voltage readings as “phantom” voltage and they realize the measurement is of no consequence. Many electricians prefer the old analog, low input impedance voltmeters so as not to be confused by these readings. If one places a 10kohm resistor across the terminals of the modern DVM, the phantom reading will disappear. The 10kohm resistor across the terminals makes the system neither more nor less safe than it was previously, it simply lessens the value of an irrelevant reading. Lastly and again, a complete circuit must be realized before perceptual current can flow.
...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
18K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K