Change in the object's kinetic energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the change in an object's kinetic energy as it moves under the influence of a force described by the function F(x) = 3x² + 4. Participants are examining the work done on the object as it transitions from x = 1 to x = 3 meters, and the discrepancies in the calculated kinetic energy change.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to calculate the work done using integration and questioning the validity of different results. Some are exploring the implications of using F(x) versus F(t) and discussing the relationship between force and work.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with multiple interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants have provided calculations leading to different conclusions about the change in kinetic energy, and there is no explicit consensus on the correct answer. Guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between force and work.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of potential typos in the problem statement or packet, and participants are questioning the relevance of the variable used in the force function (F(x) vs. F(t)).

UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
A force acting on an object given by the function F(x)=3x^2 + 4, where F is in Newtons and x is in meters. what is the change in the object's kinetic energy as it mores from x=1 to x=3 m?

W=6x
it changes from 6 J to 18 J
the answer 12 J is not the correct one
it says 26 J

why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is W = 6x?
 
W=F’=∫P

F(x)=3x^2 + 4
F'(x)=6x
 
This is what i get

[tex]W = \int^{3}_{1} (3x^2 + 4)\vec{i} \cdot dx \vec{i}[/tex]

[tex]W = x^3 + 4x]^{3}_{1} = 34 J[/tex]

Work-Kinetic Energy Principle

[tex]\sum_{i=1}^{n} W_{i} = \Delta K[/tex]

so

[tex]\Delta K = 34J[/tex]
 
that's not even one of the choices. Does it matter if it was F(x) instead of F(t)?
 
Just so you know, i believe that 26 is wrong also.

EDIT*Looks like cyclovenom got there first. The 34 is correct.

Remember, W is not F', its the other way around.

F = W'


And yes it does matter if it was F(x) instead of F(t).
 
Last edited:
how would F be different if it was F(t)?
 
Parth Dave said:
Just so you know, i believe that 26 is wrong also.

And yes it does matter if it was F(x) instead of F(t).

I am with Parth Dave, are you sure about this, urban?
 
the packet must have a typo then

Cyclovenom, I never see you on ICQ :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K