New Reply

throwing a dice

 
Share Thread
Feb23-12, 12:56 PM   #1
 

throwing a dice


Suppose I throw a dice and want either 6 or 1. The probability for that is obviously 1/3. Now suppose instead, that I throw two dices but only want 6 this time. Then the probability of getting 6 is a bit lower than 2/3, but instead there is of course also a probability of getting for instance 6 on both dices.

Now say I throw the dices an infinite number of times. Will the average number of 1's and 6'1 on the first dice and average number of 6's on the 2nd two dices be the same?

And if so, how can I realize that?
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Feb23-12, 01:31 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
If you count the two die 6-6 case as 2 then yes.
Feb23-12, 01:40 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
By the way, there is no such word (in English) as "dices". "Dice" is the plural of "die".
Feb23-12, 01:54 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor

throwing a dice


You can try using the expected value for a random variable.

Halls of Ivy: Congratulations on your 2^15 posts!.
Feb23-12, 01:58 PM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Bacle2 View Post
You can try using the expected value for a random variable.

Halls of Ivy: Congratulations on your 2^15 posts!.
You could, but I think that's really overkill. The only difference between the two situations is the labeling of the sides. The two cases must give the same result by a principle of indifference.
Feb23-12, 02:04 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by kai_sikorski View Post
You could, but I think that's really overkill. The only difference between the two situations is the labeling of the sides. The two cases must give the same result by a principle of indifference.
You're right that it's overkill; I just thought the OP asked to have a formal proof.
Feb23-12, 02:12 PM   #7
 
Someone once told me it had to do with the fact, that both of them follow a "product distribution" or something like that? Is that true?
Feb23-12, 02:14 PM   #8
 
btw... It seems like you guys think of it as intuitive. I don't - please give me an example that makes it intuitive :)
Feb23-12, 07:07 PM   #9
oay
 
Quote by HallsofIvy View Post
By the way, there is no such word (in English) as "dices".
Be careful; you're dicing with death with that remark.
Feb23-12, 07:19 PM   #10
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by aaaa202 View Post
btw... It seems like you guys think of it as intuitive. I don't - please give me an example that makes it intuitive :)
Okay, maybe the thing to do is to go to expectations. Let X1 be 1 if the die is 1 or 6. Due to mutual exclusion of those events and law of total expectation

E[X1 | D = 1] P(D = 1) + E[X1| D=2]P(D=2) = 1*1/6 + 1*1/6 = 1/3

So due to law of large numbers if you did this experiment N >> 1 times you would expect (~N/3) occurrences of 1 or 6. Letting X1 be 1 if the first die is 6 (0 otherwise) and X2 be 1 if the second die is 6 (0 otherwise)

E[X1 + X2] = E[X1] +E[X1] = 1*1/6 + 1*1/6 = 1/3

So again after N>>1 tries you would expect (~N/3) 6s.
Feb24-12, 01:13 AM   #11
 
Quote by HallsofIvy View Post
By the way, there is no such word (in English) as "dices". "Dice" is the plural of "die".
"Dice" is the plural of "die," as when referencing a gambling object,

but "dices" is a plural to "dice," as in "cutting up an apple into dices."

Also, "dices" is a verb.

And "die," when meaning a machine that stamps/cuts out a shape,
has the plurals "dies" and "dice."


http://www.answers.com/topic/dice


http://www.answers.com/topic/die-manufacturing
Feb24-12, 07:15 AM   #12
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Thanks, guys, I bow to superior knowledge.
Feb24-12, 08:12 AM   #13
 
Help me please. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the original question. As I read it he is asking "what's the probability of rolling a 1 or a 6 on one roll of a die?" Clearly 1/3. As I read the second question, he is asking "what is the probability of rolling at least one 6 on a roll of two dice?" The answer is the complement of getting no 6's on the roll of two dice, or 1-(5/6)(5/6)=11/36. You guys appear to be saying that they are equal. How am I misreading the question? Thanks.
Feb24-12, 09:00 AM   #14
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
No he was asking how many times 6s would come up, so you count the 6 - 6 case as 2
Feb24-12, 09:40 AM   #15
 
So he was asking for the expected number of 1's or 6's on a single roll of the die vs. the expected number of 6's in a roll of two dice? I didn't read that, thanks. Both expectations are 1/3.
Feb24-12, 09:41 AM   #16
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
yup! ;)
Feb24-12, 10:12 AM   #17
 
Thanks, it helps to be talking about the same problem.
New Reply

Similar discussions for: throwing a dice
Thread Forum Replies
Throwing an irregular dice Classical Physics 0
Throwing dice 7 times Calculus & Beyond Homework 6
probability of throwing a 6 in dice Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Throwing dice? Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Throwing Dice Calculus & Beyond Homework 2